<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kate Looby sure is popular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prairieprogressive.com/2006/02/23/kate-looby-sure-is-popular/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2006/02/23/kate-looby-sure-is-popular/</link>
	<description>thoughts while vastly outnumbered on the northern great plains</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Biz</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2006/02/23/kate-looby-sure-is-popular/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=647#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Actually God didn't send His son so that we can sin, He sent His son as an atonement for our sins, He made a way for us to not be seperated from Him. This is far from "fire insurance, and the attitude you are taking only cheapens grace and neglects the fact that the same God who sent His Son is in fact a just God that hates innocent bloodshed, and what it does to all parties. No one is redeemed through the blood of Jesus without repentance. And that means turning from wrong, being sorry for it, and turning to obedience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually God didn&#8217;t send His son so that we can sin, He sent His son as an atonement for our sins, He made a way for us to not be seperated from Him. This is far from &#8220;fire insurance, and the attitude you are taking only cheapens grace and neglects the fact that the same God who sent His Son is in fact a just God that hates innocent bloodshed, and what it does to all parties. No one is redeemed through the blood of Jesus without repentance. And that means turning from wrong, being sorry for it, and turning to obedience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2006/02/23/kate-looby-sure-is-popular/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=647#comment-162</guid>
		<description>I believe that if Kate Looby is on a high horse, more power to her.  I don't think she ever stated that her views were the views of everyone.  The concept of state government, or any level of government dictating morality is sickening, and about as anti-democracy as you can get.  What's the next step, only attending government sanctioned churches, or religous gatherings.  I feel that a woman should have the right to choose, not that they would choose to have an abortion, but they have the choice.  It is interesting to me that the "religous" people that oppose this seem to forget that God gave his son so that we would have the choice between sin or not.  The Bible I am familiar with supports having choices, not condenming people for their choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that if Kate Looby is on a high horse, more power to her.  I don&#8217;t think she ever stated that her views were the views of everyone.  The concept of state government, or any level of government dictating morality is sickening, and about as anti-democracy as you can get.  What&#8217;s the next step, only attending government sanctioned churches, or religous gatherings.  I feel that a woman should have the right to choose, not that they would choose to have an abortion, but they have the choice.  It is interesting to me that the &#8220;religous&#8221; people that oppose this seem to forget that God gave his son so that we would have the choice between sin or not.  The Bible I am familiar with supports having choices, not condenming people for their choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teej</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2006/02/23/kate-looby-sure-is-popular/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Teej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=647#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Kate Looby needs to get off her self-aborbed highhorse and understand that she does NOT represent the majority of women in South Dakota, but only a select few. The rest of us aren't impresssed with her presentation and implication that all women in South Dakota are as ruthless and as lacking in morals as she herself is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate Looby needs to get off her self-aborbed highhorse and understand that she does NOT represent the majority of women in South Dakota, but only a select few. The rest of us aren&#8217;t impresssed with her presentation and implication that all women in South Dakota are as ruthless and as lacking in morals as she herself is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
