<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Dakota&#8217;s female judges rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prairieprogressive.com/2006/03/04/south-dakotas-female-judges-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2006/03/04/south-dakotas-female-judges-rule/</link>
	<description>thoughts while vastly outnumbered on the northern great plains</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2006/03/04/south-dakotas-female-judges-rule/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=655#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Sounds like an interesting concept, rating judges.  I like the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like an interesting concept, rating judges.  I like the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
