<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading from the perfect library (or not)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prairieprogressive.com/2008/04/17/reading-from-the-perfect-library-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2008/04/17/reading-from-the-perfect-library-or-not/</link>
	<description>thoughts while vastly outnumbered on the northern great plains</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2008/04/17/reading-from-the-perfect-library-or-not/#comment-5800</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/2008/04/17/reading-from-the-perfect-library-or-not/#comment-5800</guid>
		<description>I can't help but think you're selling yourself a little short--surely you had to read the Illiad and the Oddysey in high school, and Winnie the Pooh at some time.  It is a very English list though (despite the odd absence of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass).  The classics section could have been picked by WS Maugham (very similar to a series he edited, but dear lord--George Elliot instead of Moby Dick, and Trollope instead of the Brothers Karamazow?), and only a Brit would have picked something by Wyndham instead of something by Heinlein.  I loved the pick of JL Seagull, mainly because I loved the book when I was 11 (I'd be afraid to read it today though)
Out of curiousity, how many of the movies have you seen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but think you&#8217;re selling yourself a little short&#8211;surely you had to read the Illiad and the Oddysey in high school, and Winnie the Pooh at some time.  It is a very English list though (despite the odd absence of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass).  The classics section could have been picked by WS Maugham (very similar to a series he edited, but dear lord&#8211;George Elliot instead of Moby Dick, and Trollope instead of the Brothers Karamazow?), and only a Brit would have picked something by Wyndham instead of something by Heinlein.  I loved the pick of JL Seagull, mainly because I loved the book when I was 11 (I&#8217;d be afraid to read it today though)<br />
Out of curiousity, how many of the movies have you seen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 18.04.06 Reading from the perfect library (or not) : www.literaryagenda.com</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2008/04/17/reading-from-the-perfect-library-or-not/#comment-5647</link>
		<dc:creator>18.04.06 Reading from the perfect library (or not) : www.literaryagenda.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/2008/04/17/reading-from-the-perfect-library-or-not/#comment-5647</guid>
		<description>[...] 17, 2008  PRAIRIEPROGRESSIVE: I noted yesterday The Telegraph’s list of the 110 books it considers “the perfect library.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 17, 2008  PRAIRIEPROGRESSIVE: I noted yesterday The Telegraph’s list of the 110 books it considers “the perfect library.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
