<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers back in Senate shield law proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal</link>
	<description>a blog about books, reading and other things that bring nuance to life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:11:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers in federal shield law headed to Senate floor &#171; KELOLAND.com &#124; Issues Blogs</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8581</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers in federal shield law headed to Senate floor &#171; KELOLAND.com &#124; Issues Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8581</guid>
		<description>[...] week, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent to the Senate floor a version of the Free Flow of Information Act that appears to include [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent to the Senate floor a version of the Free Flow of Information Act that appears to include [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caheidelberger</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8397</link>
		<dc:creator>caheidelberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8397</guid>
		<description>Ah, I see! Thanks! Let us know when you find the amendment language. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see! Thanks! Let us know when you find the amendment language. <img src='http://prairieprogressive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8396</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8396</guid>
		<description>OpenCongress has the language of the bill as first introduced.  The definition in it, though, doesn&#039;t contain the &quot;primary intent&quot; language or that the intent must be present at the “inception of the newsgathering process.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenCongress has the language of the bill as first introduced.  The definition in it, though, doesn&#8217;t contain the &#8220;primary intent&#8221; language or that the intent must be present at the “inception of the newsgathering process.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caheidelberger</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8395</link>
		<dc:creator>caheidelberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8395</guid>
		<description>Hey, looks like OpenCongress.org has the revised language:

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s448/text</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, looks like OpenCongress.org has the revised language:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s448/text" rel="nofollow">http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s448/text</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caheidelberger</title>
		<link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8394</link>
		<dc:creator>caheidelberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8394</guid>
		<description>Very cool. You hit the key point: I&#039;d hate to think that a portion of my First Amendment rights hinge on whether I can get a job with a specific subset of employers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool. You hit the key point: I&#8217;d hate to think that a portion of my First Amendment rights hinge on whether I can get a job with a specific subset of employers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
