<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Bloggers back in Senate shield law proposal</title> <atom:link href="http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal</link> <description>a blog about books, reading and other things that bring nuance to life</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Bloggers in federal shield law headed to Senate floor &#171; KELOLAND.com &#124; Issues Blogs</title><link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8581</link> <dc:creator>Bloggers in federal shield law headed to Senate floor &#171; KELOLAND.com &#124; Issues Blogs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:30:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8581</guid> <description>[...] week, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent to the Senate floor a version of the Free Flow of Information Act that appears to include [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent to the Senate floor a version of the Free Flow of Information Act that appears to include [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: caheidelberger</title><link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8397</link> <dc:creator>caheidelberger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:58:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8397</guid> <description>Ah, I see! Thanks! Let us know when you find the amendment language. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see! Thanks! Let us know when you find the amendment language. <img
src='http://prairieprogressive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8396</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:43:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8396</guid> <description>OpenCongress has the language of the bill as first introduced.  The definition in it, though, doesn&#039;t contain the &quot;primary intent&quot; language or that the intent must be present at the “inception of the newsgathering process.”</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenCongress has the language of the bill as first introduced.  The definition in it, though, doesn&#8217;t contain the &#8220;primary intent&#8221; language or that the intent must be present at the “inception of the newsgathering process.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: caheidelberger</title><link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8395</link> <dc:creator>caheidelberger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8395</guid> <description>Hey, looks like OpenCongress.org has the revised language:http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s448/text</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, looks like OpenCongress.org has the revised language:</p><p><a
href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s448/text" rel="nofollow">http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s448/text</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: caheidelberger</title><link>http://prairieprogressive.com/2009/10/31/bloggers-back-in-federal-shield-law-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-8394</link> <dc:creator>caheidelberger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:37:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://prairieprogressive.com/?p=6025#comment-8394</guid> <description>Very cool. You hit the key point: I&#039;d hate to think that a portion of my First Amendment rights hinge on whether I can get a job with a specific subset of employers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool. You hit the key point: I&#8217;d hate to think that a portion of my First Amendment rights hinge on whether I can get a job with a specific subset of employers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/21 queries in 3.031 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: prairieprogressive.com @ 2012-05-24 22:45:12 -->
