Blogroll

Dicta and miscellany

  • Chad at CCK points us to a study purportedly showing that the more psychotic a voter is, the more likely they were to vote for Bush.
  • I missed this NPR story on “reading the law” when it aired. I recall watching Archie Bangs of Rapid City in the courtroom when I was a reporter. He was purported to be the last South Dakota lawyer to have been admitted by “reading the law” and he was a top-notch lawyer. Although I have only my own 20 years of law practice to base it on, I think an apprentice approach is too dangerous today because I don’t know that the quality of lawyers has grown commensurately with the number.
  • Another NPR story I missed was one marking the fifth anniversary of the death of George Harrison on Wednesday. I wasn’t the only one to overlook it. A news search reveals virtually no traditional media took note of the anniversary, other than “today in history” items. From my perspective that’s shameful. Harrison’s death brought tears to my eyes and I wore a black t-shirt with the cover photo from Hey Jude on it to our office Christmas party that year in honor of him. Harrison was really the only one you could see on the shirt on under a sport coat. Just listening to the NPR story online saddened me.
  • Nathalie Rothschild at Spiked is one of the few to have openly acknowledged that just because actor Michael Richards went on a n-word tirade doesn’t mean you can’t still love Cosmo Kramer.
  • Nature reports that a geared mechanical device called the Antikythera Mechanism that spent 2,000 years at is technically more complex than any known device for at least a millennium after it was built. Belived to have been built in Greece near the end of the second century BC, the device computed and displayed the movement of the Sun, the Moon and possibly the planets around Earth, and predicted the dates of future eclipses.

All things must pass
All things must pass away

Title Track, George Harrison, All Things Must Pass

More marginalia

A variety of matters have kept me from doing anything substantive outside of work, let alone reading and writing reviews I need to do. Thus, another collection of marginalia, to be soon followed by some dicta and miscellany.

  • The NYT announced its 10 Best Books of 2006. I’ve read two, both nonfiction: Rory Stewart’s excellent The Places in Between (reviewed here) and Danielle Trussoni’s Falling Through the Earth (reviewed here). Interestingly, the books that won the National Book Award for fiction and nonfiction didn’t make the NYT‘s cut.
  • And the award we’ve all been waiting for has been announced: the Literary Review Bad Sex in Fiction Award. I’ll let you see what won in the winner’s thoughts on the accolade. (Via, somehwat appropriately, Blog of a Bookslut.)
  • As a follow up to the last Marginalia entry, The Library of America has announced what will be in its Philip K. Dick volume. And Ron Hogan at GalleyCat, who really broke the news on the PDK entry, collects a list of other suggestions for LOA volumes.
  • When it comes to giving up on a book, I don’t have any hard and fast rules. The 100 Page Rule, the Page 99 (or 69) Rule or the 33% Rule all seem just a tad bit more artificial than necessary. Fortunately, I have yet to encounter a book I’ve been selected to review that I couldn’t finish. I may not have liked it but I made it through.
  • The Encyclopedia Britannica has launched its own blog. (Via Rebecca’s Pocket.)

A book must be the axe for the frozen sea within us.

Franz Kafka

Marginalia and miscellany


The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words.

Philip K. Dick, I Hope I Shall Arrive Soon

Book Review: This Is Your Brain on Music (2006)

Many freely admit they are addicted. I am one of them. We can’t go through a day without listening to music on the radio, a stereo or MP3 player. Purchase of concert tickets or a new release by a favorite artist ranks among the necessities of life. Snippets of songs heard in passing almost immediately bring back memories of other times and places. Regardless of how many times we may have heard them, other songs inevitably give us goose bumps.

It all seems so easy. The music just goes in your ears and there’s a range of positive to negative reaction. But as Daniel Levitin makes clear in his book, This Is Your Brain on Music: The Science of a Human Obsession, there is so much going on behind the scenes that even the world’s top scientists and psychologists cannot explain it. And although far from perfect, Levitin’s effort and its related web site is a worthy exploration of what we know about how and why music is such an integral part of the human experience.

Levitin’s book is, in his words, “about the science of music, from the perspective of cognitive neuroscience.” Don’t let that scare you off. The introduction establishes that this isn’t going to be simply a dry recitation about music, science and the brain. In fact, Levitin’s introduction is reminiscent of the scene in Cameron Crowe’s Almost Famous where the young, fictional Crowe is enthralled as he listens to The Who’s Tommy while exploring and being entranced by the LP cover. For Levitin, it is not album covers but headphones. They revealed a depth to music he had never encountered.

To me, records were no longer just about the songs anymore, but about the sound. Headphones opened up a world of sonic colors, a palette of nuances and details that went far beyond the chords and melody, the lyrics, or a particular singer’s voice. …. Headphones also made the music more personal for me; it was suddenly coming from inside my head, not out there in the world.

That experience helped lead Levitin to become a session musician, recording engineer and record producer. Yet his fascination with the perception of sound and music took him even farther, leading him to a degree is neuroscience and, ultimately, to become the head of the Levitin Laboratory for Musical Perception, Cognition, and Expertise at McGill University in Montreal.

The introduction is typical of how Levitin approaches the subject. He blends experiences all of us have had, songs most of us know and his personal history with the more straightforward details of music, science and scientific studies to help us understand the impact of music. And in that respect, the title may be perfect. Borrowed from the advertising campaign on the impact of illegal drugs on the brain, Levitin shows us the entirely legal effect music has on our brains and brain chemistry.

This is not always an easy task. For one, it is not easy to explain music principles and theories to non-musicians. By the same token, the anatomy and chemistry of the brain aren’t always easily grasped by those who aren’t that interested in science. That is the hurdle Levitin seeks to overcome in the opening chapters, which attempt to explain not only basic music theory and concepts but also basic brain science. Levitin describes these areas as plainly and simply as possible. Still, some of the terminology and concepts may cause a reader’s eyes to glaze over a bit and their mind to wonder if they grasp, let alone need or want to know, all the concepts. But ultimately the pay-off is worth the price.

We think it comes so easy. Throw on a CD or put the earphones from an MP3 player in your ears and you hear music. What is stunning and fascinating, though, is that your ears don’t hear music per se.

Sound is transmitted through the air by molecules vibrating at certain frequencies. These molecules bombard the eardrum, causing it to wiggle in and out depending on how hard they hit it (related to the volume or amplitude of the sound) and on how fast they’re vibrating (related to what we call pitch). But there is nothing in the molecules that tells the eardrum where they came from, or which ones are associated with which object. The molecules that were set in motion by the cat purring didn’t carry an identifying tag that says cat, and they may arrive on the eardrum at the same time and in the same region of the eardrum as the sounds from the refrigerator, the heater, Debussy, and everything else

Find that explanation a little too abstract for your tastes? This is just one of the many places Levitin makes the science understandable. He follows this explanation with an example any of us can understand. Imagine a number of people throwing as many or as few ping pong balls (sound molecules) as they want at a pillowcase stretched over a bucket (the eardrum). Standing where you cannot see the people and looking only at how the pillowcase moves, you must determine how many people are throwing, where they are and whether they are moving toward or away from the pillowcase or just standing still.

No, music doesn’t flow in the ear and into the brain as one discrete item or on its own channel, nor does any other sound in the room or on the street. Instead, the brain must extract information about the sounds and then integrate them into what we ultimately perceive as music, a cat purring or a car horn. Far from a “no-brainer,” particularly considering it happens instantaneously and on the fly.

This is just one of many examples of how Levitin relates neuroscience to our everyday experiences with music. Why do we get songs or snippets of songs “stuck in our head”? Do some people have a genetic predisposition to be top-notch or world class musicians or can a certain amount of practice make it a reachable goal for almost anyone? Why do we like or dislike certain types of music? Why do certain songs, particularly those we heard as teenagers, tend to stay in our memories for so long? And given his past musical background, Levitin also takes a practical approach to explain the emotional impact of music and how our relationship with music is such that at times we are more open and vulnerable to it than our friends and relatives

We allow [musicians] to control our emotions and even our politics — to lift us up, to bring us down, to comfort us, to inspire us. We let them into our living rooms and bedrooms when no one else is around. We let them into our ears, directly, through earbuds and headphones, when we’re not communicating with anybody else in the world.

In the end, Levitin recognizes that science cannot wholly explain our obsession with music. It is, after all, an obsession because not only does the brain process sound into music, the brain is also the vehicle by which music also affects our feelings and emotions. That is where This Is Your Brain on Music may be most successful. While examining the science of the human relationship with music, Levitin never forgets music is a personal relationship and, in fact, strives to reinforce and bolster the relationship.


The power of art is that it can connect us to one another, and to larger truths about what it means to be alive and what it means to be human.

Daniel J. Levitin, This Is Your Brain on Music

Thanksgiving trimmings


Nothing survives
But the way we live our lives

“Daddy’s Tune,” Jackson Browne, The Pretender