Blogroll

Demonstrating the danger of J.A.I.L.

It isn’t very often I disagree with PP when it comes to the Judicial Accountability Initiative Law (J.A.I.L.). Yet one area of disagreement arises from his recent post about finding two South Dakotans (at least two who have more than an initial for a first name) who support J.A.I.L.

PP concluded J.A.I.L. would not have […]

Well, it’s sort of a J.A.I.L.house award

I’ve previously talked about how hurt I was that PP got the nod from the South Dakota J.A.I.L.ers as their “most critical” blogger. I’m evidently moving up in the J.A.I.L. world — I think.

The comment about PP is gone. And while there’s still various references to us and bloggers, I get a whole paragraph […]

You judge the 10 answers on J.A.I.L.

I was remiss in not mentioning this last evening when PP told me it was about to be posted. He got a response from Bill Stegmeier on the 10 questions he sent Stegmeier about the Judicial Accountability Initiative Law (J.A.I.L.). The questions and answers are posted both at No on Amendment E and South Dakota […]

J.A.I.L’s California shell game – Chapter 4

This series looks at how proponents of South Dakota’s proposed Judicial Accountability Initiative Law (J.A.I.L.) move shells around to divert attention when certain issues they don’t want to discuss come up. One of the more interesting items that’s come up in it is from Ron Branson, the author of J.A.I.L.. He recently said, “I am […]

J.A.I.L.’s California shell game – Chapter 3

Here’s another look at the shell game being played by the originators of the Judicial Accountability Initiative Law (J.A.I.L.). Yet this one also looks at who thinks they’re going to call the shots if J.A.I.L. is adopted.

As the J.A.I.L. Lies series noted, last year the national J.A.I.L. organization said that liability under J.A.I.L. would […]