A Progressive on the Prairie

thoughts while vastly outnumbered on the northern great plains

A Progressive on the Prairie RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

Favorite Film Friday: Apocalypse Now

Maybe it’s the fact I grew up during the Vietnam War but I’m a fan of many of the movies about it. Apocalypse Now, Francis Ford Coppola’s adaptation of Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness in the setting of that war, is a classic. I’m not alone in that opinion.

apocalypse nowRotten Tomatoes’ critics give American Beauty 98 percent on its “Tomatometer,” while other critics give it a 90 percent. It won the Golden Palm at the 1979 Cannes Film Festival. In the U.S., it was nominated for best picture at both the 1980 Oscars and the 1980 Golden Globes (losing in both instances to Kramer vs. Kramer). With the advantage of more perspective, it currently ranks 36th on IMDB’s Top 250. It was 28th in the American Film Institute’s 1998 list of America’s 100 Greatest Movies and dropped only to 30th when that list was updated 10 years later.

Apocalypse Now scores with me for several reasons. Perhaps most important is that it is as real — and surreal — as our nation’s experience in the war. Briefly stated, Martin Sheen plays an American captain who travels upriver on a patrol boat into Cambodia to “terminate with extreme prejudice,” i.e., assassinate, a rogue American colonel. As for reality, we see how the characters, particularly Martin Sheen and Marlon Brando, slide from normality to madness. We see how the havoc of war can produce a devolution into barbarity and can make the abnormal normal.

The surreal aspects illustrate the rupture in the American psyche of the times, a rupture to which the war significantly contributed. We have the U.S. military out to kill one of its own. We have Air Calvary helicopter squads launching an attack so the commander can surf at a marvelous beach with a world-class surfer who is on the patrol boat (a sequence the includes the unforgettable line, “I love the smell of napalm in the morning”). We have chaos erupting as a Playboy bunnies are brought in to entertain the troops. We have a near psychedelic portrayal of a continuing battle between the U.S. and North Vietnamese trying to destroy and rebuild the same bridge. There is a common theme — the mission — but it and all around it seem fractured.

And just as the Vietnam War was a catastrophe for the American psyche, the making of Apocalypse Now was the same for the filmmaker and crew. Storms, lack of money and even a nervous breakdown. How many classic movies themselves spawn an exceptional documentary about the making of the film?

Apocalypse Now is far more than a war movie. It is a visual compendium of an entire era of American history that is as strong today as when first released 30 years ago.


We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders won’t allow them to write “fuck” on their airplanes because it’s obscene!

Col. Kurtz (Marlon Brando), Apocalypse Now

Booking Through Thursday: Celebrity

btt21

Do you read celebrity memoirs? Which ones have you read or do you want to read? Which nonexistent celebrity memoirs would you like to see?

Generally, no, although I make exceptions for musicians, such as Dylan, Clapton, Zappa or others whose music I’ve enjoyed. I do have a copy of Sidney Poitier’s autobiography that I picked up at a used bookstore in my TBR bookshelf but have yet to open it. I have also read the memoirs of one or two authors, if they can be considered celebrities.

I think I read the musician memoirs not because they are celebrities per se but because their music has played some role in my life. And taking the term “nonexistent” celebrities literally, I’d have to say memoirs by Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison are at the top of the list.


Celebrity is a mask that eats into the face.

John Updike, Self-Consciousness

Midyear Reading Challenge report

As a follow up to this week’s Musing Mondays, I figured this would be a good time to check on how I’m doing on the reading challenges I adopted for the year. So far, more than so good. I’m actually one book shy of completing all three. Here’s the tally so far:

Notable Books Challenge — read six books from “notable book lists” from a variety of sources.

Books read: This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War, Drew Gilpin Faust; The Ten-Cent Plague: The Great Comic-Book Scare and How It Changed America, David Hajdu; Dangerous Laughter: Thirteen Stories, Steven Millhauser; A Free Life, Ha Jin; and Breath, Tim Winton

Favorite: Dangerous Laughter.

Lost in Translation Reading Challenge — read six books in translation over the course of the year. (On this one, I kind of “overachieved.”)

Books reviewed: Yalo, Elias Khoury (Arabic); Every Man Dies Alone, Hans Fallada (German); Detective Story, Imre Kertész (Hungarian); The Unit, Ninni Holmqvist (Swedish); and God’s Mercy, Kerstin Ekman (Swedish).

Books read but not reviewed: Amerika: The Missing Person, Franz Kafka (German); The Drinker, Hans Fallada (German); Tranquility, Attila Bartis (Hungarian); and, The Thief and the Dogs, Naguib Mahfouz (Arabic).

Favorite: Every Man Dies Alone.

World Citizen Challenge — read five books about foreign countries from among three of the following categories: politics, economics, history, culture or anthropology/sociology, worldwide issues, and memoirs/autobiographies.

Books read: Commander of the Faithful: The Life and Times of Emir Abd el-Kader, John W. Kiser (history); Yalo, Elias Khory (worldwide issues – torture); Kidnapped: And Other Dispatches, Alan Johnston (memoirs); “Socialism Is Great!”: A Worker’s Memoir of the New China, Lijia Zhang; (memoirs) and, To Live or to Perish Forever: Two Tumultuous Years in Pakistan, Nicholas Schmidle (politics/worldwide issues/memoir).

Favorite: To Live or to Perish Forever

Perhaps I need to spend the Fourth looking for a new reading challenge or two.


In a very real sense, … people who have read good literature have lived more than people who cannot or will not read.

S. I. Hayakawa, Language in Thought and Action

Law’s greatest hits — among legal researchers

We hear about bestseller lists, the Top 40 and all sorts of measures of popularity of various items in our culture. But what about in the world of American law? What kind of top 10 list would there be?

LexisNexis, which provides online legal research services among other things, has arrived at one such list. It has compiled the Top 10 most frequently accessed U.S. Supreme Court decisions. According to LexisNexis, this list is of the cases “most often downloaded by legal researchers for various purposes.” I’m not sure if that means the list is limited to those cases that are actually downloaded nor is there a specific time period mentioned. Regardless, it’s an interesting slice of what’s popular in American law and it has some surprising entries.

Here’s the countdown:

10. Burlington Industries v Ellerth (1998) — Perhaps for employment law geeks lawyers only. The case deals with whether an employer can be held liable for a hostile work environment created by a supervisor.

9. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. (19865) — Decided the same day as number 8, a procedural biggie for civil litigation lawyers. Sets the standards for how a trial court is to evaluate summary judgment motions, specifically in libel actions.

8. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett (1986) — This is sort of a companion case to number 9, as it helped set the current standards for summary judgment motions, although this one does not involve the heightened level of proof required in some libel actions.

7. Roe v. Wade (1972) — If I have to tell you what this is, you’ve been under a rock for the last 35 years.

6. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music (1994) — Established that a parody — 2 Live Crew’s take on Roy Orbison’s “Oh, Pretty Woman” — can constitute “fair use” of copyrighted material even if done for commercial purposes.

5. Gonzales v. Raich (2005) — The “medical marijuana” case, in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government may ban the use of marijuana even where states approve it being used for medicinal purposes.

4. Morse v. Frederick (2007) — School district’s suspension of a student for displaying a banner reading “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS” during school-related event did not violate the student’s First Amendment rights.

3. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly (2007) — Definitely for antitrust law geeks lawyers only. Deals with how to plead a conspiracy claim under the Sherman Antitrust Act.

2. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., No. 21 (1969) — The seminal student free speech case dealing with students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War.

1. Terry v. Ohio (1968) — Recognized the validity of “stop and frisk” searches by law enforcement.

I would certainly think if a list of the most sought after cases by the general public were compiled, it would be much different. For example, the Miranda decision would likely be on the list and Roe v. Wade would be higher. At the same time, the fact Tinker and Morse are in the top four indicates that the First Amendment rights of students continues to be a persistent issue.


…where a police officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude in light of his experience that criminal activity may be afoot and that the persons with whom he is dealing may be armed and presently dangerous … he is entitled for the protection of himself and others in the area to conduct a carefully limited search of the outer clothing of such persons in an attempt to discover weapons which might be used to assault him.

Terry v. Ohio

July Bibliolust

I was actually hoping to get into the TBR piles this weekend — if I can resist the omnipresent bibliolust (such much for my observations on want vs. need). Anyway, it may depend on how quickly a couple books I have on hold show up at the local library. Here’s what’s currently on my radar:

American Pastoral, Philip Roth — I know. It was published 10 years ago but it’s shown up on so many recommended lists lately — and been recommended by friends — that I started to feel I’m missing something important. Therefore, I await a library copy, hopefully yet this week.

Everything Matters!, Ron Currie, Jr. — While it may also be fertile grounds for disappointment, I have to take a leap on a novel about someone who knows exactly when the world will end — especially when it’s compared favorably to Vonnegut.

The Kindly Ones, Jonathan Littell — This French novel about a Nazi SS officer has not only generated controversy due to its subject but is evidently a book you love or hate. Publisher’s Weekly called it an “overlong exercise in piling-on” but it’s won the highest literary awards in both France and Greece. It’s on the list because I may just have to decide for myself.

The Photographer: Into War-torn Afghanistan with Doctors Without Borders, Didier Lefèvre and Emmanuel Guibert — I’ve seen and heard plenty of favorable reviews of this combination of photography with the graphic novel format that when I saw the local library had it I put it on my hold list.

The Secret Speech, Tom Rob Smith — While I can’t say I was knocked over by Smith’s first novel, it was good enough that I figured it wouldn’t hurt to put my name on the hold list for this.

Tears in the Darkness: The Story of the Bataan Death March and Its Aftermath, Michael and Elizabeth Norman — When I did some quick background checking on this when it was offered for review, I decided it was worth a read, especially since a gentleman who lived down the street from me when I was in elementary school was among those captured on Bataan.


No matter how busy you may think you are, you must find time for reading, or surrender yourself to self-chosen ignorance.

Atwood H. Townsend in Good Reading

Midweek Music Moment: Waka/Jawaka, Frank Zappa

With the Fourth of July upon us, it seems an appropriate time to celebrate a unique American music: jazz. So, you wonder, why is this post about Frank Zappa? The vast majority of the uninitiated think Zappa was just a weird rock musician. In point of fact, he was a too often unheralded explorer of the jazz fusion idiom. In fact, he might even be considered one of its pioneers.

waka jawakaZappa first really explored jazz-rock with his 1969 solo album, Hot Rats. That record came just a few months after Miles Davis released In a Silent Way, which represented his immersion into fusion. On July 5, 1972, Zappa confirmed his interest in the genre with the release of Waka/Jawaka.

Some refer to Waka/Jawaka as “Hot Rats II,” not only because of the music but the faucets on the water taps on the cover read “Hot” and “Rats.” This album, though, came at a rougher time in Zappa’s life. In December 1971, Zappa was pushed from a stage in London, resulting in a month in the hospital and a year in a cast or wheelchair. Because of his physical limitations, he spent quite a bit of time in the studio and the results indicated he’d certainly been listening to Miles, who had added the best-selling Bitches Brew and A Tribute to Jack Johnson to his fusion catalog.

The influence is seen in the opening cut of Waka/Jawaka, recorded in large part with studio musicians. “Big Swifty,” which took up the entire first side of the original LP, echoes what Davis was doing. Part of the resemblance is undoubtedly due to trumpeter Sal Marquez, who’d previously played with both Buddy Rich and Woody Herman. Still, the instrumental piece left little doubt Zappa still had the jazz-rock bug and was very adept at it. If anything, he’d taken it a step further and gave it more of a big band feel with his studio soundboard skills. That did, however, impact the tune a bit. Although technically excellent, the tune is slightly lacking in improvisational energy.

For whatever reason, side two opens with what I consider a couple throw away tunes. “Your Mouth” is a blues-based tune that is closer to more standard Mothers fare. “It Just Might Be A One-Shot Deal” is similar, but also imported not only jazz but both rock and country feel thanks to a pedal steel performance from “Sneaky Pete” Kleinow from The Flying Burrito Brothers. The two songs feature vocals but, combined, are less than half the length of “Big Swity” and nearly five minutes shorter than the title cut, which closes the album.

The instrumental title cut demonstrated Zappa was not influenced by Davis alone. It has a more big band feel and echoes the rock end of the jazz-rock movement, be it early Chicago, some BS&T or even The Flock. Here, Zappa includes not just Marquez on trumpet but two trombone/baritone players, as well sax, piccolo and flute. At the same time, the tune remains more Zappaesque than “Big Swifty,” although the latter would tend to be performed on subsequent tours.

Significantly, Waka/Jawaka was not Zappa’s last foray into fusion. Just four months later he would release The Grand Wazoo, which further explored the idiom with an even bigger ensemble. In fact, the title cut used 11 woodwind and brass players. Thus, in the space of three years, three solo Zappa albums explored jazz through the concept of rock. Zappa’s estate has done an excellent job monitoring his music and releasing various recordings. Hopefully, some day it will provide us with a Zappa jazz collection.


Jazz: The Music of Unemployment.

Subheading in Frank Zappa, The Real Frank Zappa Book

From 50 books for today to 100 books of all time

Newsweek, to which I haven’t subscribed for more than a year, must feel its books coverage is lacking. First there was the Fifty Books for Our Time. Now it’s got a “meta-list” of The Top 100 Books. It’s a meta-list because it is compiled from 10 separate lists of best books, including not only its Fifty Books for Our Time but lists from Oprah’s Book Club to Wikipedia to U.K. newspapers.

I’m not going to repeat the list given its length. I note that will I’ve read the top two (War and Peace and 1984), there’s only two others I’ve read in the top 20 (The Catcher in the Rye and Catch-22). And, surprisingly, that’s fairly constant, as this breakdown reveals:

1-20: four
21-40: four
41-60: five
61-80: four
81-100: zero (that’s right, zero!)

Thus, percentage-wise, I’m just slightly above where I was on the books for our time list. I think my showing here stems from the fact that about a quarter of the books are “classics” from the 19th Century or earlier and roughly another quarter are from the 20th Century but pre-date the Depression. That hits a gap in my literary background because, with most classics, unless a teacher or professor made me read it, I didn’t.


Many books require no thought from those who read them, and for a very simple reason — they made no such demand upon those who wrote them.

Charles Caleb Colton, Lacon

I have a ways to go on the Fifty Books for Our Times

Newsweek is out with a variation of the “books you should read” list. Rather than simply a best of list, the magazine says its Fifty Books for Our Times “open a window on the times we live in.” I’m still struggling with how a couple of the choices, particularly the first, made the list — but since I haven’t read them I can’t say the description supporting the selection in the magazine is wrong.

Here’s the list, with the ones I’ve read in bold:

  1. The Way We Live Now, Anthony Trollope
  2. The Looming Tower, Lawrence Wright
  3. Prisoner of the State, Zhao Ziyang
  4. The Big Switch, Nicholas Carr
  5. The Bear, William Faulkner
  6. Winchell, Neal Gabler
  7. Random Family, Adrian Nicole LeBlanc
  8. Night Draws Near, Anthony Shadid
  9. Predictably Irrational, Dan Ariely
  10. God: A Biography, Jack Miles
  11. The Unsettling Of America, Wendell Berry
  12. A Good Man is Hard to Find, by Flannery O’Connor
  13. Underground, Haruki Murakami
  14. Disrupting Class, Clayton Christensen
  15. Air Guitar, Dave Hickey
  16. Leaves of Grass, Walt Whitman
  17. The Trouble with Physics, Lee Smolin
  18. City: Rediscovering The Center, William H. Whyte
  19. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Philip K. Dick
  20. Benjamin Franklin, Edmund S. Morgan
  21. The Mississippi Books, Mark Twain
  22. Among the Thugs, Bill Buford
  23. Brooklyn, Colm Toibin
  24. Frankenstein, Mary Shelley
  25. Bad Mother, Ayelet Waldman
  26. Guests of the Ayatollah, Mark Bowden
  27. Whittaker Chambers, Sam Tanenhaus
  28. Midnight’s Children, Salman Rushdie
  29. American Prometheus, Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin
  30. The Lost, Daniel Mendelsohn
  31. Gilead, Marilynne Robinson
  32. Pictures at a Revolution, Mark Harris
  33. Kim, Rudyard Kipling
  34. Walking With the Wind, John Lewis
  35. The Line of Beauty, Alan Hollinghurst
  36. The Dark is Rising, Susan Cooper
  37. Persepolis, Marjane Satrapi
  38. Underworld, Don DeLillo
  39. Why Evolution is True, Jerry A. Coyne
  40. American Pastoral, Philip Roth
  41. The Botany of Desire, Michael Pollan
  42. The Regeneration Trilogy, Pat Barker
  43. Senator Joe McCarthy, Richard H. Rovere
  44. Year of Wonders, Geraldine Brooks
  45. The Elegance of the Hedgehog, Muriel Barbery
  46. Gone Tomorrow, Lee Child
  47. Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achebe
  48. American Journeys, Don Watson
  49. Cotton Comes To Harlem, Chester Himes
  50. The New Biographical Dictionary of Film, David Thomson

It would be a good thing to buy books if one could also buy the time in which to read them.

Arthur Schopenhauer, “The Art of Literature

Musing Mondays: Mid-year reading report

musing-mondays-new

Now that we’ve come to the middle of the year, what do you think of your 2009 reading so far? Read anything interesting that you’d like to share? Any outstanding favourites?

My reading so far this year indicates my translated literature fixation continues. Not surprisingly, then, it accounts for one of my favorites this year — German author Hans Fallada’s Every Man Dies Alone. I also read his earlier work, The Drinker, which I didn’t find as strong but still demonstrates that the skill shown in Every Man Dies Alone is not a fluke.

My other favorite so far is actually a book that first came out a decade ago. Were it not for that fact, Stewart O’Nan’s A Prayer for the Dying would be a candidate for my novel of the year. I’m just glad I picked up the 10th anniversary release.


A book that is shut is but a block.

Robert Lanham, “Gnomologia

Book Review: God’s Mercy by Kerstin Ekman

Sense of place is not just a combination of geography and culture, it is a synergy of the two. Swedish author Kerstin Ekman doesn’t seek to describe sense of place in her novel God’s Mercy. She does something far more difficult. Sense of place so permeates the novel it moves from being a setting to almost its own unspoken character.

god's mercyGod’s Mercy is a captivating tale of life in northern Sweden in the early part of the 20th Century. Hillevia is a young, recently educated midwife who moves from Uppsala, a university town just north of Stockholm, to a forested area of northern Sweden called Blackwater in March 1916. It is amidst and inhabited by the Sami people, known to English speakers as Lapps. Life is not easy here. It is a land where there are eight seasons, each of which dictate the rhythm of survival and existence. Life here, Hillevia notes several years later, is “full of invisible agreements among the people,” agreements that are “in a language etched into the very earth.” The people live largely from working timber or herding reindeer. Not only do economic strata arise, so do language and cultural differences among the Norwegians, Swedes and Lapps, the last often viewed as inferior.

When Hillevia is called on for her first delivery, it is at the home of a poor family in a remote village. The family patriarch is less than pleased by or accommodating to Hillevia’s presence. She is a newcomer, an outsider, intruding upon those who are outsiders themselves. The experience and its aftermath change her and the life of a boy in the house, Elis. Elis runs away from his family. Hillevia is left questioning the nature and extent of God’s mercy.

The novel follows both Hillevia and Elis over the next several decades. There are two narrative perspectives for Hillevia’s story. One is hers, the other is Risten, a younger woman whose relationship to Hillevia is not clear until later in the novel. Hillevia comes to develop her own sense of place there, loving the area and its people, even marrying and having a family. Yet some still view her as an outsider, a transplant from a higher social and economic class who is not part of their sense of place. The concept not only is the stage on which the story is played out but helps portray the people and Hillevia.

Elis’ story, meanwhile, has echoes of a Dickens character, as he combats abuse, illness and poverty to become an artist. He, too, is an outsider but in the reverse of Hillevia’s. Despite his talent, he struggles for acceptance in the cities and among the urbane society to which his art introduce him. His character, though, does not feel as developed and real as Hillevia’s and he can come off as almost a tangential part of the story. Yet Eckman’s time developing Hillevia’s story and the sense of place that imbues it is time very well spent.

The book, translated by Linda Schenk, is the first in Ekman’s “Wolfskin” trilogy. The other two novels follow the destinies of the characters in God’s Mercy, and their descendants, through the end of the 20th Century. Ekman has been widely translated and Blackwater is the locale for and title of what is perhaps her best known novel in the U.S., a detective thriller. God’s Mercy is her first work in the European Women Writers Series published by the University of Nebraska Press and is certainly a worthy addition.


I s’pose we’re all afeared of the truly poor.

Kerstin Ekman, God’s Mercy

AddThis Feed Button

http://www.wikio.com


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Now Reading

  • Tears in the Darkness: The Story of the Bataan Death March and Its Aftermath

    Tears in the Darkness: The Story of the Bataan Death March and Its Aftermath by Michael Norman

View full Library

Blogs of SD

Books

Hockey

Music

Notable Sites & Blogs

Podcasts

Political

SF

Search Posts

Categories

LibraryThing

Book doodads

My Blogcritics Posts

LibraryThing Early Reviewers

Book Challenges

6 / 6
(COMPLETED)

5 / 5
(COMPLETED)

Notable Books

5 / 6
(83%)

Blog doodads

The Out Campaign

The Out Campaign: Scarlet Letter of Atheism

Disclaimer

The views expressed here are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for my law partners, our associates, staff and clients or my family and friends. Not only should any opinions here not be attributed to them, chances are they probably don't agree with me.

Contact me

You can e-mail me at prairieprogressive at gmaildotcom.

GFY stats

Meta