Blogroll

A belated Book Festival follow-up

I know, it’s been a couple weeks since the Festival of Books. But, as you can see, I’ve been mostly absent from the blog. Being crazy busy at work doesn’t go well with oral surgery (fortunately after the Festival), especially when it greatly impairs your ability to speak. Besides, one of the items just came to my attention today.

Of course, I made it a point to ask Karl Marlantes to inscribe my favorite nonfiction book of last year. I also attended his presentation on Matterhorn: A Novel of the Vietnam War. I must admit leaving a bit sheepish. After years of contending that symbolism in novels is more a creation of English teachers than authors, Marlantes’ discussion explained the tons of symbolism in that novel. And, further proving my illiterati status, I missed virtually all of it when I read the book.

Then, an email earlier this week from the Humanities Council mentioned a few Festival items, including that Fobbit author David Abrams wrote a blog post about his experiences. One of his observations: “[O]n the second day, an older gentleman passed me in the lobby, did a double-take when he saw my nametag, and reached out a hand to stop me. ‘I read your book three weeks ago–got it from the library–and I really enjoyed it. You certainly have a different take on the war. I never been in the service or been close to combat, but I could appreciate what you were doing with that book.'”

That “older gentleman” (true but painful) was me. Considering it was a spur of the moment, 30-second conversation prompted entirely by seeing his tag, Abrams’ recall is quite accurate. What strikes me, though, is that a simple comment can mean something to an author. Not only does it make me glad I stopped him, I won’t hesitate the next time such an opportunity arises.

The post also makes me wish I’d had a longer chat with Abrams. Here is what he said about the Marlantes book I loved so much:

I consider What It Is Like to Go to War one of the most IMPORTANT books of our young century. It should be required reading for every member of the armed forces, highest rank to lowest rank; as well as: members of Congress, housewives, career women, stay-at-home dads, stockbrockers, bricklayers, college faculty, Taco Bell fry cooks, hawks, doves, and everyone else in between.

Here is what I said in my brief review of the book:

The list of those who should be required to read the book is long: every decisionmaker and policymaker in the Department of Defense, every NCO and officer in the military, and every member of Congress. It better be on President’s Obama’s list of “books I read this summer.” What It Is Like to Go to War should be assigned reading at every military academy and in any fundamental leadership course for non-academy military training. In fact, it is a book that should be read by everyone who relies on the military. In other words, it should be read by all of us.

While he certainly was more articulate, I guess great minds do think alike.


War is society’s dirty work, usually done by kids cleaning up failures perpetrated by adults.

Karl Marlantes, What It Is Like To Go To War

Banned Books Week: Challenged books that shaped America

Even though I’m not doing a week-long series of posts this year, I couldn’t let Banned Books Week pass without at least one. So, I thought it appropriate to mentioned banned books that helped shape the country.

Now I’m not the one who designated these books. Rather, earlier this year the Library of Congress came up with a list of “Books That Shaped America,” The designation doesn’t mean these are the best books written in America. Instead, these are books that had “a profound effect on American life.”

Given the country’s occasional struggles when someone thinks freedom of expression and the freedom to read conflict with their personal opinion or political temperament, it perhaps isn’t surprising that roughly one-quarter of the books on the list have been challenged or banned at some point in their history. Here’s the books that received the dual “honors”:

  • Moby-Dick, Herman Melville (1851)
  • Leaves of Grass, Walt Whitman (1855)
  • The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain (1884)**
  • The Call of the Wild, Jack London (1903)
  • The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald (1925)
  • Gone with the Wind, Margaret Mitchell (1936)
  • Their Eyes Were Watching God, Zora Neale Hurston (1937)
  • The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck (1939)
  • For Whom the Bell Tolls, Ernest Hemingway (1940)
  • Native Son, Richard Wright (1940)
  • The Catcher in the Rye, J.D. Salinger (1951)**
  • Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison (1952)
  • Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury (1953)**
  • Howl and Other Poems, Allen Ginsberg (1956)
  • To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee (1960)**
  • Catch-22, Joseph Heller (1961)
  • Stranger in a Strange Land, Robert Heinlein (1961)
  • In Cold Blood, Truman Capote (1966)
  • Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, Dee Brown (1970)
  • Our Bodies, Ourselves, Boston Women’s Health Book Collective (1971)
  • Beloved, Toni Morrison (1987)**

And if you think this just reflects the more restrictive attitudes of the 1950s, the books with asterisks have been challenged at least once in the last eight years, a few of them almost every year.


It’s very, very easy not to be offended by a book. You just have to shut it.

Salman Rusdie

Weekend Edition: 9-29

Bulletin Board

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

  • 50 Years of the Jetsons: Why The Show Still Matters (“Five decades after its debut, not a day goes by that someone isn’t using ‘The Jetsons’ as a way to talk about the fantastic technological advancements we’re seeing today. Or conversely, evidence of so many futuristic promises that remain unfulfilled.”) (via)
  • On Falling Apart (“The week after my 30th birthday, my best friend had me committed to a psych ward.”) (via)
  • Blasphemy: an indispensable human right (“What this idea really bespeaks is a terror that most faiths contain at their core: that serious, skeptical, dispassionate evaluations of their specific claims will reveal them to be indefensible, hollow and easily debunked.”) (via)

Blog Headlines of the Week

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


The clouds are like headlines
On a new front page sky

Tom Waits, “Shiver My Timbers,”
The Heart of Saturday Night

Weekend Edition: 9-22

Bulletin Board

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


Serenity now!

Frank Costanza (Jerry Stiller), “The Serenity Now,” Seinfeld

Weekend Edition: 9-15

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

  • Politico-psychopathology (“Not that politicians and pundits are mentally ill in a clinical sense, but politics in American national life today can only be presented in pathological form. Politics no longer involves the public use of reason; it is instead a matter of psychopathology…”) (via)
  • On Cursing (“There is something about cursing well…about knowing how to deploy curse words to maximum effectiveness…that speaks volumes about your position in the larger scheme of things.”)

Blog Line/Comment of the Week

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


I never change, I simply become more myself.

Joyce Carol Oates, Solstice