|
|
Ann from the Books on the Nightstand blog and podcast tagged me with the “7 Things” meme, in which you are supposed to post seven random things about yourself. Believe it or not, it’s a bit harder than it seems. Anyway, here goes:
1. As much as I love watching hockey, to the best of my recollection I have only been on ice skates once in my life. I remember going to a rink in my hometown once early in junior high and getting horrible blisters despite basically skating on my ankles. Haven’t tried it since and doubt there are many rinks around that are interested in teaching a fat old guy with bad ankles.
2. Not only don’t I ice skate, I have gone downhill skiing twice in my life, have never used cross country skis or snowshoes and haven’t been sledding since my youngest entered middle school. Given that we hit 24 below this week (without wind chill) and frequent wind chill temps colder than that, ask me again why I’ve lived here all my life.
3. For more than 30 years I have slept almost exclusively on a waterbed. The only exceptions were summer jobs and the like where it was a pain to disassemble and move the bed. They’re absolutely wonderful in the winter (particularly ones like this one) and great for bad backs and aching joints (which I seem to resemble). Of course, it used to be every town had two or three waterbed stores. Now it’s damn hard to find a waterbed locally.
4. The best job I ever had in my life was a college work-study job. Somehow, in the summer of 1977, I lucked into being the game room attendant in the student union. Now between the fact there’s hardly anybody using the game room in the summer and I’m a lifelong pinball addict, it was a dream come true. I spent the summer getting paid to sit by the cash register (giving me the time to read The Hobbit and the entirety of the Lord of the Rings trilogy) or, if no customers were around, playing pinball or pool for free.
5. The backyard of the house I live in abuts a five acre abandoned cemetery established in 1892. The exact number of bodies buried there is unknown but between then and 1906 there were between 15 and 50 burials, including a civil war veteran, a husband and wife, and “numerous orphans.” Only the civil war veteran’s grave is marked and the neighborhood legend is the other grave markers were wood and burned in a prairie fire. Thus, it now is basically prairie that the county mows during the spring and summer.
6. My favorite bookstore in the U.S. is Green Apple Books on Clement Street in San Francisco. In addition to being able to spend hours wandering its shelves, the surrounding markets and cafes are far more original Chinese than Chinatown.
7. I am mostly a second generation American. My maternal grandmother immigrated with her family and my maternal grandfather by himself from the Ukraine (they were Black Sea Germans from Russia). My paternal grandmother came from northern Germany when she was a child.
There you have it. I’m also going to adopt Ann’s variation of the rule and tag three people:
Clark
Commander Other
Michael
Here are the rules should they decide to participate:
1. Link to the person who tagged you.
2. Post the rules.
3. Write 7 random things about yourself.
4. Tag 7 people and link to their blogs.
5. Let each person know they were tagged by leaving a comment on their blog.
6. Let the tagger know when your entry has been published.
Randomness scares people.
Fran Lebowitz

But, enough about books … Other things have words, too, right? Like … songs!
If you’re anything like me, there are songs that you love because of their lyrics; writers you admire because their songs have depth, meaning, or just a sheer playfulness that has nothing to do with the tunes.
So, today’s question?
What songs … either specific songs, or songs in general by a specific group or writer … have words that you love?
Why?
And … do the tunes that go with the fantastic lyrics live up to them?
Hmmm, given that I just wrote about 1,000 words on Blood on the Tracks, I better mention it and point to the lyrics I quoted. Of course, Dylan is part of my “musical trinity.” Springsteen and Jackson Browne are the other two members and their lyric talent is certainly part of the reason. And actually close behind is Ben Folds, with and songs like “The Luckiest” (where death in part is an expression of deep love) or “The Ascent of Stan” (asking us baby boomers “how’s it feel to be the man?”).
I think the thing is that many of their lyrics resonate with our own feelings, hopes and disappointments. And for me, it isn’t always the things you’d think would jump out. For example, in “Waitin’ On A Sunny Day,” the line “Without you I’m a drummer, girl, that can’t keep a beat” always grabs me. Likewise, knowledge can make other lyrics take on deeper meaning. Thus, you get a different take on “Don’t confront me with my failures/I had not forgotten them” from Browne’s “These Days” when you know he wrote the song at age 17.
But lyric ability isn’t alone the test. As I noted with the BOTT post, the musical style and voice inflections are what give many of the songs on that album such impact. And it can also be impacted by seemingly minor things. Thus, on “Idiot Wind,” the drummer moves in and out of a gunshot-like beat in conjunction with the lyric “In the final end he won the wars/After losin’ every battle.” Similarly, immediately at the end of the Springsteen line above, drummer Max Weinberg intentionally misses the beat.
Ultimately, it’s kind like the “Rate-A-Record” segment on Dick Clark’s American Bandstand. Even if the lyrics are great, it ain’t gonna get a high mark unless it’s got a beat.
Go on ahead and throw some seeds of your own
And somewhere between the time you arrive and the time you go
May lie a reason you were alive
But you’ll never know
“For A Dancer,” Jackson Browne, Late for the Sky
It started small. Just a Socialist Club at a local high school in the fall of 2007. Then, a year ago, the city designated an area of town “Pettigrew Heights,” after original Sioux Falls booster and former U.S. Richard Pettigrew. Now, the school district has named a new elementary school “R.F. Pettigrew.”
Don’t get me wrong. I think it’s great given that, among other things, he was the state’s first full-term U.S. Senator, served on the city’s first school board, and was one of its first lawyers, if not the first. His role in the formative history of Sioux Falls and the state is significant. It’s just that I doubt many people are familiar with his political philosophy and I’d wager it gets little if any exposure in our education system. Otherwise, I’d expect more of an uproar. Why? Because although it was written some 20 years after Pettigrew left office, his 1922 book, Triumphant Plutocracy, displays that at some point Pettigrew adopted a socialist/Marxist bent. Here’s just a few excerpts from the book:
The first sentences of the Foreword:
The American people should know the truth about American public life. They have been lied to so much and hoodwinked so often that it would seem only fair for them to have at least one straight-from-the-shoulder statement concerning this government “of the people, by the people and for the people,” about whose inner workings the people know almost nothing.
On why laborers have none of the country’s wealth:
[The laborer] is exploited out of it by the landlord, by the corporation which employs him, by the corporations which furnish him public utilities, by the insurance companies and trust companies which charge three times what it is worth to do the business, and by the general system of combination of the parasites and idlers of society, who get away from the producers of wealth what their labor has created.
On capitalism:
[Capitalism is] an unworkable system of social organization — a system that has been tried repeatedly during the past three or four thousand years, and that has destroyed civilization as often as it has been tried.
More on capitalism:
This is the system of dividing the community into two classes — owners and producers — and of rewarding the owners at the expense of the producters. As I read history, this method of social organization has had and can have only one result. The leisure class rots out and drops to pieces; the workers starve and suffer and die
His prediction on the 20th Century: (quoting his Nov. 22, 1900, letter to Clara Barton)
I believe the new century will open with many bloody revolutions as a result of the protest of the masses against the tyranny and oppression of the wealth of the world in the hands of a few, resulting in great progress toward socialism and the more equitable distribution of the products of human toil and, as a result, the moral and spiritual uplifting of the race.”
On Russia:
The Russian Revolution is the greatest event of our times. It marks the beginning of the epoch when the working people will assume the task of directing and controlling industry. It blazes a path into this unknown country, where the workers of the world are destined to take from their exploiters the right to control and direct the economic affairs of the community.
Curious about whether these were lifelong views or ones developed late in life, it’s prompted me to resume reading Wayne Fanebust’s Echoes of November: The Life and Times of Senator R. F. Pettigrew of South Dakota. One thing is certain: Pettigrew could never win a U.S. Senate seat today, in South Dakota or any other state.
But since we’re naming so many things after this iconoclast, maybe we should also take the time to learn about the man and his times, how he arrived at his views, whether they were reflective of the opinions of the day and what they reflect not only about his life but our own local and national history.
[Lawyers] should not be entrusted with any share in the direction of public affairs.
R.F. Pettigrew, Triumphant Plutocracy
I’m not one who tends to throw around superlatives. But there’s no doubt in my mind that not only is Blood on the Tracks perhaps the most exceptional Bob Dylan album, it is one of the finest albums ever.
Released on Jan. 17, 1975, Blood on the Tracks is seen as a reflection of his failing marriage. Even though Dylan has occasionally indicated the songs aren’t autobiographical, it doesn’t really matter. Either way, the album is one of the most painfully eloquent expressions of love, relationships and anguish ever recorded.
The album has its own somewhat storied history that resulted in half the songs being rerecorded in the Twin Cities. But it isn’t the history that’s significant. It’s the unparalleled content. The album is replete with excellent music. If there is a downfall to BOTT, it’s the fact it came out when you had to flip over an LP to listen to the other side. I was (and still am) always so enraptured by side one that I tended to listen to it again (or even again) rather than flip the LP over. Thus, I’ve neglected side two over the years despite the high quality material it contains, a neglect that’s also reflected here.
The album opens with the now-classic “Tangled Up in Blue,” followed by the often covered “Simple Twist of Fate.” Dylan plays freely with chronology and perspective, respectively, as he does elsewhere on the album. “Tangled Up in Blue” is the first indication that much of the guitar work here is exceptional. The song becomes almost self-propelled as it details the history of a relationship where “We always did feel the same/We just saw it from a different point of view.” The second track, meanwhile, focuses on how a “Simple Twist of Fate” can impact relationships and produce an unintended “emptiness inside.” Most important, both songs demonstrate how crucial Dylan’s intonation and inflection are to the work. While that’s always been important in Dylan’s performances, it is perhaps at its peak here.
While these songs are impeccable, the exquisite opening guitar work tells you that “You’re a Big Girl Now” is something special. In it, the protagonist’s wife/lover has just ended their relationship. Dylan leaves no doubt he’s “singin’ through these tears” and his plea that “I can change, I swear” resonates with painful earnestness. But Dylan’s lyric artistry comes in the last verse, where six words eloquently and simply describe the loss of love. It is, Dylan sings, “Like a corkscrew to my heart.” There is no way reading the lyrics does them justice. The emotive quality of Dylan’s voice makes the feelings palpable.
If “You’re a Big Girl Now” portrays grief, “Idiot Wind” shows other stages of that process, with anger the most evident. The choruses are based on the title and, in the early stages, that wind is “blowing every time you move your teeth.” The anger builds to malice, as Dylan acidly sings:
You hurt the ones that I love best
And cover up the truth with lies
One day you’ll be in the ditch,
Flies buzzin’ around your eyes,
Blood on your saddle
Yet as the song relentlessly pushes forward, there also seems to be some form of acceptance. First, there’s regret:
You’ll never know the hurt I suffered
Nor the pain I rise above
And I’ll never know the same about you,
Your holiness or your kind of love
And it makes me feel so sorry
By the end, it’s a realization: it’s “we,” not just “you,” who are the idiots.
Dylan then shifts momentum with “You’re Gonna Make Me Lonesome When You Go.” Clocking in at under three minutes, the tune is up-tempo for a reason. Here the love still exists and although the protagonist “could stay with you forever/and never realize the time,” it is he who decides to stay behind. It is a near perfect coda to an emotional wringer.
Much of side two continues the emphasis on lost love and failed relationships. The opening cut, “Meet Me in the Morning,” takes a bluesy approach as the singer copes with the fact that “every day’s been darkness since you been gone.” Dylan then shifts focus with the one song that doesn’t deal with relationship decay (or does it?). Imbued with a rapid western swing feel, “Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts” is a lengthy but relatively light-hearted tale. It seems like a story about murder and robbery in an Old West town but debate still continues among devotees about what it actually says and means. Over the course of nearly nine minutes, Dylan does not repeat any phrase or chorus in its detailed and complex story.
Failed relationships, though, return with the final three songs. The simple and straightforward “If You See Her, Say Hello” recognizes that “She still lives inside of me/We’ve never been apart” while “Shelter from the Storm” focuses on how the protagonist was rescued but observes that “Now there’s a wall between us, somethin’ there’s been lost.” Somewhat like side one, Dylan closes with a relatively simple piece, “Buckets of Rain.” Even though there’s buckets of tears flowing out of the singer, there’s a hint of hope underlying the message.
Some might think all this becomes boring or too depressing. But Dylan’s use of different styles and perspectives keeps each song fresh. More important, because they feel so brutally honest, it is hard to imagine these songs won’t resonate with the listener’s own experience and emotions. Dylan is seen as the spokesman of a generation, the folk hero turned traitor, the epitome of the protest singer. Yet the poetry and emotion of BOTT is where Dylan most eloquently reveals the true power of music.
Life is sad
Life is a bust
All ya can do is do what you must.
You do what you must do and ya do it well
“Buckets of Rain,” Bob Dylan

How did you react to assigned reading when you were in school/university/college/etc? How do you think on these books now? What book were you ‘forced’ to read when you where in school that you’ve since reread and loved?
I still blame/credit high school English for the fact I can’t tolerate Shakespeare. Of course, at that age who really wanted to read that stuff? Yet even briefly revisiting his work in college reinforced my dislike of it. The assigned reading I recall liking in high school were literary classics, such as Mark Twain and Dickens (even though he could be a bit of a struggle).
When it comes to college, there’s a interesting dichotomy. With the exception of the science fiction class I took, the only book I still have that was assigned in an English class is Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago. I wasn’t a big fan but have meant to go back and read it over the last 30 years. With most of the assigned reading in English, I think I struggled with the concept that there’s some deeper meaning or intent behind every so-called “literary” works. My illiterati status still leaves me thinking that maybe it was just a story the writer wanted to tell.
In contrast, a variety of the assigned reading from my history courses remains on my bookshelves. I think that’s because the instructor in my first college history course was so good he became one of my two favorite college professors. Not only did I end up with a history minor with probably 90 percent of the credits coming from classes he taught, I actually took a full year of History of American Foreign Policy from him — and absolutely loved it. The assigned reading in most of the history classes was sufficiently well written that, in addition to giving insight to the time periods, they were actually interesting reads.
As far as I can recall, there aren’t any assigned books I disliked that I’ve gone back and read. I would be remiss, though, if I didn’t mention that one of the books on my list of desert island books — Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon — was assigned reading in a political science class. I have read probably two or three times since.
The past is never dead. It’s not even past.
William Faulkner, Requiem for a Nun
|
Disclaimer 
Additionally, some links on this blog go to Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. There is no additional cost to you.
Contact me You can e-mail me at prairieprogressive at gmaildotcom.
|