Blogroll

Obama ballot challenge rejected

Bob Mercer reports that the state Board of Elections voted 6-0 this morning to reject a challenge filed by a Rapid City man to President Barack Obama being on the ballot in South Dakota.

The vote was not based on the validity of the claims that Obama isn’t a natural-born U.S. citizen, uses someone else’s Social Security number and posts a false birth certificate. Instead, as Cory pointed out, the challenge is not within the scope of the federal law on which the complaint was based and, as a result, the board lacks jurisdiction.

No word on whether the complainant participated in the 11 minute teleconference. One thing that is certain is that this certainly isn’t the end of these accusations.


Every two years the American politics industry fills the airwaves with the most virulent, scurrilous, wall-to-wall character assassination of nearly every political practitioner in the country – and then declares itself puzzled that America has lost trust in its politicians.

Charles Krauthammer, October 1994

Elections + Obama + zealots = ballot challenge

We see all too frequently that getting information in today’s world isn’t the problem; it’s the ability to evaluate it. Latest case in point? The regular meeting Friday of the South Dakota Board of Elections includes an agenda item on a complaint filed to keep President Barack Obama off the ballot.

Thomas Scheveck beats three old horses raises three points in his formal complaint (which I’ve redacted to remove some addresses and phone numbers).

  1. Obama is not a natural born citizen of the U.S. as required by the U.S. Constitution but, rather, “a British subject.”
  2. Obama is using the Social Security number of someone born in 1890 (although I’m not sure what that has to do with the constitutional requirements).
  3. The copy of Obama’s birth certificate on the White House web page “is nothing more than a computer-generated forgery,” a “clever paste document.”

Now, granted, I don’t keep up on the news, particularly Fox News or what passes for “facts” on WorldNetDaily. But it only takes a trip to the Snopes website to see that the claims of Obama not being a natural born citizen, using a dead man’s Social Security number and having a forged birth certificate have been debunked. But then, I’m probably unaware that Snopes is owned and operated by the same Jewish banker Masonic cabal commanding the black helicopters of the New World Order.

Given that South Dakota has a total of three electoral votes and hasn’t voted for a Democratic presidential candidate in nearly 50 years, including including voting for Nixon over its own George McGovern, I’m guessing Obama isn’t going to sweat how he does here. It’s just too bad a citizen board like this needs to spend time and money entertaining political fantasies.

(Big hat tip to Bob Mercer.)


A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.

Winston Churchill, Thomas Jefferson, Nov. 24, 1808

Weekend Edition: 5-5

Bulletin Board

  • May is World in Translation Month, where independent book stores promote literature in translation.

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

    https://prairieprogressive.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=12558&action=edit

  • The Enemy Within (“If America stopped searching for goblins under the bed, it might actually be able to reset its economic priorities and start investing in the things that would make the country stronger, more prosperous, and safer again[.]”) (via)
  • Read no evil – Senior censor defends work, denies playing Big Brother (“The censors who are responsible for censoring books and other publications do an interesting job, which becomes harder during some periods of the year, yet it seems they enjoy it.”) (via)

Blog Headline of the Week

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage

Weird Shit of the Week


We’re developing a new citizenry, one that will be very selective about cereals and automobiles, but won’t be able to think.

Rod Serling, quoted in “Rod Serling: On the Way to Fame

May Bibliolust

My “nonresolution” of trying to read what I want when I feel like it seems to be having benefits. My progress on Bibliolust for both this year and past years has improved greatly. In fact, there’s only two books from this month’s list so far I haven’t read or abandoned — and for those two I’m still on the library reserve list. And a side effect appears to be I am more likely to drop a book if it isn’t grabbing me.

As usual, though, the list grows:

A Land More Kind Than Home, Wiley Cash — A review or two of this piqued my interst, I think in large part because the reviews called to mind The Evening Hour, which I enjoyed earlier this year. Perhaps that’s too much to hope for a book you find out of the blue but, again, thanks to the library I’ll be reading it.

The Colonel, Mahmoud Dowlatabadi — Feeding my foreign lit kick a bit, a review of this novel of the Iranian Revolution told from the perspective of a colonel in the Shahs’ army drew my attention. Besides, it isn’t like there’s a ton of reliable history coming out of the country.

The Lady and the Peacock: The Life of Aung San Suu Kyi, Peter Popham — I’ve been intrigued by Burma and, as a result, Aung San Suu Kyi for a number of years. That made me a bit curious about this biography and the fact the library is getting it put it on my reserve list there.

Railsea, China Miéville — It’s Miéville. That’s all that really needs to be said since he is one of maybe a handful of authors whose latest release will always be on my list.

Report Card:

January-April 2012

Total Bibliolust books: 19

Number read: 14 (73.7%)

Started but did not finish: 3 (15.8%)

Cumulative (September 2008-April 2012)

Total Bibliolust books: 222

Number read: 179 (80.6%)

Started but did not finish: 17 (7.7%)

If reading is a luxury, being human is a luxury.

Jeanette Winterson

Book Review: The Heartbreak of Aaron Burr by H.W. Brands

I grew up in an era when people still wrote letters. In fact, I remember my mother sitting down at least once a week writing to friends and relatives out of town, many on a weekly or biweekly basis. Today, though, letters are more rare. We tend to rely on email or text messaging to communicate with each other.

So why does a biography of Aaron Burr bring this to mind? Well, one of the primary sources for The Heartbreak of Aaron Burr is Burr’s letters, particularly to his daughter, Theodosia. Author H.W. Brands and, in turn, readers of his sketch of Aaron Burr and his life, should be thankful that Burr not only wrote plenty of letters, he kept copies.

Although Burr is the subject of numerous biographies, Brands’ use of the letters between Burr and Theo, named after her mother, allows a somewhat different perspective. As the title may suggest, the book seems to look more at Burr the man than the other categories in which he could be placed — politician, duelist, accused traitor. While Brand concisely covers the breadth of Burr’s life, it is clear that the father-daughter relationship was an extraordinary one. Burr was decades ahead of his time when it came to Theo. Throughout his life, he was devoted to seeing that she had an education equal to any man’s. Even after she was married and a mother, Burr would suggest matters for her to study and ask that she report back her thoughts and ideas upon doing so. His view of women was such that he described Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, one of the earliest works of feminist philosophy, as “a work of genius.”

Despite his love for his daughter, Burr’s ambitions frequently took him away for extended periods of time. Yet those ambitions never produced the greatness Burr believed was his destiny. Burr’s political status in his native New York made him one of the key figures in the struggle between Alexander Hamilton’s Federalists and Thomas Jefferson’s Republicans, a dispute Brands summarizes rather handily. This would lead him to become Jefferson’s vice president in 1800, only for Jefferson to shut him out and for Burr left off the ticket when Jefferson sought re-election.

The Heartbreak of Aaron Burr also recites the political atmosphere and style that led a longstanding enmity between Hamilton and Burr to culminate in the duel in which Hamilton was killed. While dueling was illegal, it was not uncommon. Although still vice president, Hamilton’s death stirred such a reaction that Burr had to flee to avoid criminal prosecution. Becoming essentially a political pariah, Burr ventures out to explore the U.S. west of the Allegheny Mountains, a venture that would result in Burr being tried for treason.

Brands fairly outlines the supposed scheme in which Burr engaged and its players. Essentially, he is accused of assembling an armed force — which he did — in an effort to have the western areas split from the United States, forming their own nation. In addition, he wanted to gain control of Louisiana and invade Mexico. Still, Burr was circumspect enough that the full extent of his plans and goals remain unclear. When an alleged co-conspirator sends Jefferson a coded letter supposedly written by Burr, the president proclaims Burr guilty of treason and directs federal authorities to arrest him. Burr is ultimately indicted by a grand jury for treason.

Abut a quarter of the slim volume deals with Burr’s 1807 trial. There’s good reason. As Brands note, not only does it present key issues about the only crime set out in the Constitution, the cast of characters is “illustrious.” Burr is the defendant yet actively participates in his defense. His defense counsel includes Edmund Randolph, the first Attorney General of the United States and former Secretary of State. And as this was still in the day where Supreme Court justices would “ride the circuit” to sit as trial judges, Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the trial. The Heartbreak of Aaron Burr frequently quotes from the trial transcript in presenting the factual and legal issues in a readable and understandable fashion. Burr is acquitted but his notoriety means an effort to return to the practice of law fails. As a result, he departs for Europe.

Letters continued between Burr and his daughter while he was in Europe. Yet believing their mail may be too easily read in the lengthy transit, they use false names and employ a cipher when referring to individuals. This correspondence, though, reveals that Europe may well be the nadir of Burr’s life. Far from family and friends, unable to build support for any of his plans, and then largely stranded due to the deteriorating relationship between the U.S. and Britain that would culminate in the War of 1812, Burr is essentially destitute. He then has to sneak back into the U.S. because there remains a warrant for him as a result of the Hamilton duel. Burr’s correspondence reflects his personal and political misery, although undoubtedly the situation may have been much worse than he let on to Theo.

Once back in the U.S., Burr eventually recedes from view and he yields no power, political or otherwise. Family tragedies would further affect him and Brands’ use of Burr’s letters throughout the book that established the strength and importance of those relationships helps bring home the effect of those tragedies on him. Thus, largely from beginning to end the portrait Brands creates is crafted with Burr’s own words.

The Heartbreak of Aaron Burr certainly is not an in-depth look at the enigmatic Burr. But lengthier works tend to focus on details of what led to the duel with Hamilton and what Burr did in the west that led to the accusations of treason. As such, they give us more a picture of the political Burr than the personal one. This also makes the narrative quite readable and well-paced.

We are fortunate that individuals like Burr tended to keep copies of their letters, both sent and received. While we don’t know where where technology will take us, I can’t help but wonder whether the sources will exist in the future that make works like this possible.


In my state of nullity I wish to be forgotten till I can rise to view in a shape worthy of the hopes of my friends.

Aaron Burr, January 1809, quoted in
H.W. Brands, The Heartbreak of Aaron Burr