Blogroll

Book Review: How Music Works by John Powell

If there’s one thing that can be said about music, it’s that as much as we may love it we generally don’t want to think about it. After all, music speaks to the emotions, not logic. That’s why if you ask someone about the music they like, you will get a list of genres or artists far more quickly than an explanation why they like it.

John Powell, though, believes that knowledge can actually enhance a person’s experience with music. The problem is that understanding the building blocks of music involves discussing other, sometimes difficult topics, such as physics, neuroscience and even psychology. With How Music Works: The Science and Psychology of Beautiful Sounds, from Beethoven to the Beatles and Beyond, Powell may have arrived at something that could be called music theory for the common man. Although he is actually explaining music theory and the science behind it, he does so in a very conversational tone with practical examples and analogies. Readers are not engulfed by academic tones but more in the manner of a one-on-one discussion of what music is — with even a few “I didn’t know that!” moments thrown in. (Famed songwriter Irving Berlin couldn’t write music so he paid musicians to watch his fingers on the piano and write down what he played.)

As such, How Music Works seems to address a gap in the music-related edification of the average reader or listener. It does not look at one or more particular styles of music like music appreciation books. At the same time, it is a broader, perhaps more fundamental look at music theory than books like Daniel Levitin’s This Is Your Brain on Music, which looks at how and why music works in the brain. It ends up as a great resource for those who want to gain a basic yet better understanding of something that is important in our lives.

Powell, who has taught both musical acoustics and physics in England, deserves credit for the manner in which he expresses and helps readers understand audio concepts through written words or material that could be easily lost in jargon or theory. For example, he calls the penultimate note in a scale the “almost there” note, almost perfectly capturing the feel and sense of the note when we hear a scale. Similarly, he frequently uses two tunes we all can hum (“Baa Baa Black Sheep” and “For He’s A Jolly Good Fellow”) to help readers translate the written explanation into our own audio comprehension. (The book also includes a CD with examples from the book for those who desire more audio explanation or stimulation.) Most important, he does an excellent job of explaining fundamental yet crucial music elements.

How Music Works is not limited to the building blocks of music. Powell broadens the scope beyond music theory. For example, he explores how and why different instruments make the sounds they do and how they create what we consider musical notes or tones. He even looks at what type of instrument those interested in playing one might want to consider. Still, the focus is on the fundamental elements of music and how and why Western music developed and is created.

My major criticisms of the book may be largely personal. First, part of Powell’s conversational tone is frequent jocularity and humor. Some, though, may find too large a dose or that a large number are distracting or even sophomoric. For example, a discussion about why and how our ears function as they becomes a bit more banal with the aside that they “are also useful for supporting your sunglasses.” Then there’s occasional lines like, “I have no proof of this, but I think the decibel was invented in a bar, late one night, by a committee of drunken electrical engineers who wanted to take revenge on the world for their total lack of dancing partners.” Because humor is a question of taste, any nonfiction writer is going to run the risk his or her taste clashes with that of any number of readers.

The other criticism may reflect the personal psychic trauma of hours spent as a young piano student practicing with and attempting to memorize a device I felt embodied pure evil, “the circle of fifths.” As How Music Works explores scales and their history and variations, my eyes started glazing over and my brain shut down. It may simply be the damage caused by that experience is too great or that there is no easier or other way to explain scales and their relationships. Yet there were one or two other occasions in the book where I had a similar feeling and the length and detail of the scale discussion makes it even more noticeable.

Yet, odd as it may be, the section of the book giving rise to this criticism still reflects the value of Powell’s approach. His basic, core explanation of a scale boils down to a simple line of abbreviations for tones and semitones, two terms far easier to understand than they may sound here. Had my childhood piano teacher ever used that approach, I might actually have grasped what was behind and the importance of the circle of fifths. In fact, Powell earned my esteem in asking “why generations of unhappy children have been forced at knife-point to practice playing scales on their instruments when they could be having much more fun playing real pieces of music” and arguing the rationale for doing so is “feeble” compared to the damage it causes in kids abandoning music.

That may be the strength of How Music Works. It puts what can be difficult concepts in language and examples most anyone could understand. In so doing, Powell gives sustenance to a wide range of people who may be interested in the why and how of music, whether those with no background whatsoever to the many put off by the music pedagogy of their time.


This is the relationship most of us have with music — pleasure without understanding.

John Powell, How Music Works

Weekend Edition: 1-15

Bulletin Board

  • As any state immigration legislation is on the immediate horizon, there will be a free showing of the award-winning documentary 9500 Liberty at 6:30 pm this Thursday (Jan.) at the Main Library. The film documents the only two months in American history where an “Arizona style” immigration law was actually implemented and the event is sponsored by the ACLU of South Dakota.

Worthwhile Reading in the Interweb Tubes

  • The Tyranny of Defense Inc. (“What worked during the Cold War still works today: to get Americans on board with your military policy, scare the hell out of them.”)

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage

  • As a follow-up to last week’s item about the demise of the KELO Issues blog, I suggest David Newquist’s take on it. I agree with his perceived characteristics of the commenters — and, sadly, I think that is the case for any blog that even remotely deals with items that might be considered political. Ergo.
  • Having begun writing on a typewriter, I remain an unapologetic and unabashed two-spacer.
  • You mean I’ve been (not) reading the wrong horoscope (Virgo instead of Leo) all these years?!?!?
  • Maybe I’m not that out of touch. Rock did suck in 2010.

All the razor perceptions that cut just a little too deep
Hey, I can bleed as well as anyone
But I need someone to help me sleep

“Mrs. Potter’s Lullaby,” Counting Crows, This Desert Life

Friday Follies 3.2

There are SO MANY great lines in this Canadian legal opinion that it could fill a couple editions of Friday Follies. It undoubtedly will be an all-time classic and the footnotes alone are worth the price of admission. The judge admitted he was using “ridicule as a last resort” because the custody dispute is one where “the likelihood of an amicable resolution is laughable (hatred devours reason); and, a satisfactory legal solution is impossible (hatred has no legal remedy).” (via)

Ex-Con Allegedly Worked as Bogus Lawyer for 5 Years, May Have Watched TV Legal Dramas to Hone Skills

A California woman is suing her apartment complex after she claims she slipped and tripped on a grate while “tak(ing) a yogurt container off the head of a wild skunk.”

Disbarred Law Firm Partner Blames His Trampoline for Female Divorce Client’s ‘Soreness’

At least in Texas, it isn’t illegal to ride a mule drunk. It would be here, though, since a vehicle includes “ridden animals.”

There’s undoubtedly some logic to this: since corporations are people, a woman wants to marry a corporation.


A [middle] finger is worth a thousand words and, therefore, is particularly useful should one have a vocabulary of less than a thousand words.

Bruni v. Bruni, 2010 ONSC 6568 (Nov. 29, 2010)

Weekend Edition: 1-8

Bulletin Board

  • Cory, who when I last checked had 376 posts to my 43, comments on the fact the KELO Issues blog to which I contributed is ending, partly because of “the low number of regular contributions.” Given that I am seventh out of the eight bloggers for number of contributions (even being outpaced by someone who quit blogging at the site nearly 10 months ago), perhaps I am partly to blame. Oh, well. It’s tough to keep things going here — and most of the posts here don’t translate easily to an “issues”- oriented blog. Still, as Cory observes, it was “generally enjoyable.”

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


January, month of empty pockets!

Collette, Journey for Myself

Friday Follies 3.1

A Houston man is suing his alma mater when his son wasn’t accepted to the college following his $40,000 donation to the school.

Legal-related blog headline of the week: Romania declares witchcraft a legally-recognized (and taxable) profession, pisses off witches (The witches are fighting back, though, “using cat excrement and dead dogs to cast spells on the president and government.”)

I may be a loser but “scum sucking“? (A tip from one of my law partners that is quite handy in situations like this: just remember the phrase “I’ve been called worse by better.”)

No better time to give a 13-year-old girl in a coma a ticket for jaywalking than at the hospital. (via)


Common sense always speaks too late.

Raymond Chandler, Playback