Blogroll

Midweek Music Moment: American Woman, The Guess Who

Even though I probably wasn’t aware of the routine yet, Abbott and Costello’s classic “Who’s On First?” reminds me of buying The Guess Who’s American Woman. I called my best friend on the phone after getting the album and the conversation went something like:

“I got the new album by The Guess Who.”

“Who?”

“The Guess Who.”

“Who?”

“Not The Who, Guess Who!”

“WHO??!?!”

“You know, dammit. The Guess Who, American Woman.”

“Oh……… Is it any good?”

Yeah. It was good then and remains so today.

I have little doubt the title cut, which hit number one on the charts 40 years ago this week, led me to buy the album. Like the Abbott and Costello routine, I’m guessing the band’s earlier top 10 hits, “These Eyes” and “Laughing,” didn’t really register with me. But American Woman, the album, marked a shift for the band. The prior hits were largely on the soft side of rock. American Woman opened with the title cut, which itself opened with an acoustic blues intro. But about 75 seconds in Randy Bachman’s electric guitar made clear this was going to be a harder and edgier sound. And the trait carried through virtually all of the album.

Although acoustic guitars remained strongly in the mix, Bachman’s fuzz switch and a harder tone to Burton Cummings’ vocals made clear this was electric rock and roll. Only the third song on the album, “Talisman,” was strictly acoustic. Both “No Time” and “No Sugar Tonight/New Mother Nature,” which remain popular on “classics” radio today, had the same mix the title single announced. If anything, the fuzz box and harder rock sound was more prevalent on side two, particularly on “When Friends Fall Out.” Moreover, the band was reflecting their influences. The blues dominated “Humpty’s Blues” structure and Cummings’ vocals while it still is perhaps the most fuzzed out guitar performance. “8:15” combined call and response lyrics with a chorus driven by what can best be described as surf band guitar. The instrumental “969 (The Oldest Man),” which opened side two, had a jazz flavor to it.

The album also represented the influences that impacted bands of the era. The title cut was in the tradition of political rock, being a commentary on the state of affairs in America from the viewpoint of neighbors to the north. “New Mother Nature” reflected elements of the drug culture. Yet not all of the trends stand the test of time, as evidenced by “Talisman.’ More so than the other songs, it reflected the inclination toward obscure yet “meaningful” lyrics. As a result, although nicely performed, “Talisman” contains lines such as “Ships in bottles cannot sail and neither can a tombstone kill a feather.” No one at the time probably knew what that meant but, hey man, it must be deep.

While much of this is apparent to me now, it probably was lost on a 13-year-old kid at the time. But that still says a lot for the album which, being 40 years old, could be expected to have an anachronism or two. The fact enjoyed it then and can do so today helps explain why I view American Woman as the single best LP issued by The Guess Who.


You’re trippin’ back now to places you’ve been to
You wonder what you’re gonna find

The Guess Who, “No Sugar Tonight/New Mother Nature,” American Woman

Ongoing intermittency

They’ll be a substantive post tomorrow but things will likely be sparse around here for the immediate future. It’s even possible a few regular weekly posts may not make it. Travel will leave me with only occasional internet access and not a great deal of spare time. And, sadly, it doesn’t look like there’s any new or unique bookstores for me to squeeze into the spare time during the travels.

No doubt, the reduction in posting will break everyone’s heart. Programming should return to somewhere near normal sometime next week.


Spend the afternoon. You can’t take it with you.

Annie Dillard, Pilgrim at Tinker Creek

Weekend Edition: 5-8

Bulletin Board

Blog Headline of the Week

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


It is an unfortunate human failing that a full pocketbook often groans more loudly than an empty stomach.

Franklin D. Roosevelt, Nov. 1, 1940

Friday Follies 2.13

Stupid Legislative Trick of the Week: U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman and a couple other idjits are introducing legislation to allow Americans to be stripped of their citizenship if the State Department (not a court) concludes they are associated with a terrorist organization. I doubt it’s coincidence that these guys — who evidently don’t remember McCarthyism and the Red Scare — call it the Terrorist Expatriation Act, a/k/a the TEA Act

Stupid Legislator Trick of the Week: Looking at porn during debate on an abortion bill.

You Couldn’t Make This Stuff Up If You Tried: A teacher in Germany with a phobia over rabbits is suing a 14-year-old pupil after the student drew a bunny on the blackboard. In the teacher’s defense, she does claim the student knew of the phobia and did it intentionally because of that. (Overlawyered)

The efforts of one parent who thinks her personal views dictate what books other people and their children can get from a public library evidently have not only failed, they backfired.

The Supreme Court closes the front doors. I guess that’s okay since the inscription on the front of the building talks about “Equal Justice Under the Law,” not access to justice.

Sometimes, you kinda wish the stories in The Onion were real, such as “Supreme Court Upholds Freedom Of Speech In Obscenity-Filled Ruling.”

Had it not attributed the statement to a 2006 decision by another federal appeals court, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals would be a major contender for the year’s best line in a legal opinion. In a per curiam opinion this week, it observed that “a computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history — with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila.”

Wedding photo tips for bigamists.

Finally, at least interim resolution to a couple items appearing in prior Friday Follies:


Consciences keep silent more often than they should, that’s why laws were created.

Jose Saramago, All the Names

Book Review: Looking for the Summer by Robert W. Norris

Sociologists may debate the question but popular belief certainly holds that baby boomers, for whatever reason, were preoccupied with a search for enlightenment. While much of it was domestic exploration of Eastern culture and religions, so many Americans and Europeans journeyed from Europe through places like Turkey, Iran and Afghanistan on their way to India and Nepal in the late sixties and seventies that it gave rise to the term “hippie trail.” In Robert Norris’ semi-autobiographical novel Looking for the Summer, protagonist David Thompson journeys along the hippie trail. Yet while he is unquestionably on an introspective search for spiritual fulfillment, his journey into Iran and Afghanistan is as much by chance as design.

Like Norris, Thompson joins the Air Force during the Vietnam War. Although stationed stateside, a misadventure earns Thompson a ticket to the war zone. Yet as the time for him to ship out approaches, he refuses and seeks conscientious objector status. He ultimately faces a court martial and is convicted of “willful disobedience”, serving a year in a military prison as a result. Although that decision predates the 1976-early 1977 time frame in which Looking for Summer is set, it remains at the core of the book. Among other things, the last words Thompson has with his father, who dies when Thompson is in prison, are a heated argument over that decision. Thompson also is not so dogmatic that he is certain his decision was one of principle and commitment to any particular cause or movement. While recognizing he was a “willing player” in his battle with the military, he wonders if he “merely aped the popular slogans and anti-authority behavior of the time” to hide being a coward.

Following his release from prison, Thompson heads for Europe. Ostensibly intending to write a novel, he is more engaged in escaping what he views as the “dubiousness” of American’s quest for material gain and trying to sort out his internal dilemmas. By chance, he meets Hasan and Ataullah, from Iran and Afghanistan, respectively, in the lobby of a Paris hotel. He becomes friends with them and later joins them in Switzerland. From there, David-jan, as Hasan and Ataullah call him, has a harrowing overland journey into Iran in a car Hasan intends to resell. When he inadvertently becomes a focus of the Shah’s security forces, he heads to Afghanistan to see Ataullah and then, ultimately, into India. (Lest you think their current prominence led Norris to pick Iran and Afghanistan as two of the main settings for the novel, the book was first published in Japan in 1996.) Throughout his journeys, Thompson ponders his life, philosophy and place in the world, often aided by marijuana, psilocybin or hashish and even acquires an opium addiction he must kick.

While the drug use certainly fits the times and locales, it is also perhaps singularly symbolic of one of the problems with Looking for Summer. Much of the dialogue has the sense of what the book calls “hash-inspired thought.” Other portions come off more as a discourse on history, the politics of the time, philosophy or religion. Although Norris is quite adept at description and setting scenes, there seems a penchant to instill too much substantive meaning or message in the conversations in the novel.

Additionally, a significant number of characters appear for a handful of pages — or paragraphs — and then apparently only to convey information about a particular subject, whether art or Jimmy Carter’s promise to grant a presidential pardon to those who avoided the draft during the Vietnam war by failing to register or fleeing the country. Other characters appear only by name and perhaps brief description and add nothing substantive to the plot, such as Thompson’s last housemates before he leaves Iran. Despite that, Norris, a professor at Japan’s Fukuoka International University, uses his power of description to elevate the core characters beyond convenient stereotype.

Although Thompson often is too self-absorbed to be a truly engaging protagonist, his prison term and the life-changing effects of his decision to refuse to go to Vietnam offer an uncommon angle on a search for insight and self-knowledge. Ultimately, though, the novel tries to cover perhaps too much philosophical ground and too many musings and those aspects of the book come off as a bit too prolix. Perhaps Norris is simply trying to point out that what he calls “philosophical rambling” is not as important as real-life experience. Yet had the observational skills he displays infused more of the book’s overall tone, it would have bolstered both the theme and its eloquence.


I’ve found no answer other than there is no answer.

Robert Norris, Looking for the Summer