Blogroll

Weekend Edition: 11-7

Bulletin Board

  • I had the pleasure of speaking about blogging this week at the Newspaper Writing: Critical/Editorial course offered by Augie’s English/Journalism programs
  • If only I’d known earlier, a personal dream would come true tonight. Springsteen and the E Street Band will perform The Wild, the Innocent, and the E Street Shuffle (the greatest rock album ever made) in its entirety for the first time tonight at Madison Square Garden.

Worthwhile Reading in the Interweb Tubes

Blog Headlines of the Week

Bookish Linkage

  • Today is National Bookstore Day, designed to build the visibility of independent bookstores. South Dakota, sadly, is invisible.
  • Is The Boss writing The Book? (Via.)
  • Giving new meaning to the term “longlist,” the longlist for the 2010 International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award has 156 books on it.
  • I know NaNoWriMo is big in the book blogosphere and podcastosphere (?) but I’m more along the lines that it should probably be called Write A Shitty Novel Month. (Via.) (Oh Gawd, there’s a similar one for blogs called NaBloPoMo, where the goal seems to be quantity, not quality.)

Nonbookish Linkage


You got to learn to live with what you are

Ben Folds, “Learn to Live with What You Are,”
Supersunnyspeedgraphic

Friday Follies 1.20 (headline edition)

Sometimes the headlines (and subheads) say it all:

Man caught nude in truck uses the “explosive diarrhea” defense.

Woman Calls 911, Says Boyfriend Won’t Marry Her
Same Person Called 911 Saying She Couldn’t Find Car
(Via.)

Giant Breathalyzer Found Drunk in Ohio.

Man stabs himself so he doesn’t have to go to his job at Blockbuster.

“Sorry, Teach, I Forgot My Homework… At the House I Robbed”.

Step One: Drive By, Step Two . . . : Wisconsin Man Forgets to Roll Down Window in Drive-By Shooting — And Then Files Insurance Claim for Window.


How many fools does it take to make up a public?

Nicolas Chamfort, Maximes et pensées

Is gender germane in picking “best of” lists?

There was an uproar in the interweb/blogosphere/social media worlds this week when someone noted that Publishers Weekly‘s list of the Top 10 Books of 2009 did not include any female authors. Frankly, I didn’t notice until I saw a post about it. And while this may diving into hot water it might be wise to avoid, I don’t see any problem in being oblivious because I believe gender blindness is appropriate.

I pay no attention to the gender of an author. I read Margaret Atwood and Marilynne Robinson because I appreciate their writing, not because I think I need a female perspective. When I bought Home, I didn’t think, “There’s the new book by that female author.” I thought, “There’s Marilynne Robinson’s new book!”. Granted, gender can impact a book’s viewpoint or tone. But so can race, creed and the region or country you live in. It’s the quality of the writing or the story that’s important to me, not the gender, race or nationality slot the author might fit in. Who cares about any of that if you enjoy the book?

Now I realize some believe that women aren’t given their due in the literary world or that lists like this don’t expose people to great female authors. I don’t necessarily agree but even if it’s true, isn’t a general “best of” list supposed to be based on what you like, not who the authors are? As Laura Miller points out in a post at Salon, “If you insist on a list that’s ideally representative of gender, race, class, nationality (i.e., including at least one translation), publisher size (small as well as large), fame, length (short story collections as well as novels), region, genre and so on, you can easily wind up with, say, a list of nine books you kinda like and maybe one you truly love.” Some “best of” list.

As with the PW list, I don’t know if any female authors are on Amazon’s top 10 list for the year. Likewise, I couldn’t tell you (and haven’t gone back to check) the gender breakdown of my “best of” lists the last few years because gender never entered my mind when I picked them. As I pointed out when I noted the PW list last week, the one title on the list I’d read won’t be on my “best of” list this year. But the only reason is I wasn’t a fan of the story. And how much we love a work is really the only standard that should apply to any “best of” list.


All this pitting of sex against sex, of quality against quality; all this claiming of superiority and imputing of inferiority, belong to the private-school stage of human existence where there are “sides,” and it is necessary for one side to beat another side[.]

Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own

Buy Books for the Holidays

I’m one of those who always rants about how early Christmas stuff shows up each year. So it may be somewhat hypocritical for me to join a new book blogger effort called Buy Books for the Holidays. But I think there’s excellent reasons for doing so.

First, it’s something I’ve been doing for many years. When it comes to giving someone a Christmas gift, I often lean toward a book or, if nothing else, a gift card or certificate to a book store. Conversely, I am usually the recipient of a couple books or gift cards each Christmas, whether from family or friends.

Second, Buy Books for the Holidays goes beyond family and friends. The project is also intended to introduce people to literacy charities and encourage donations to them. In fact, check out the first such post on that topic for some excellent ideas and an expression of many of my thoughts about what avid readers owe for the wonderful gift of reading others gave us.

There’s one other reason I don’t think it’s hypocritical. I advocate books as gifts (and donating to book-related charities) year-round. In fact, I am always in favor of giving a book store gift card for graduation gifts, birthday presents for kids or any other gift-giving occasion. This effort just takes a period when our nation truly becomes the “United States of Buy” and tries to focus at least a bit of that on literacy and reading.

So, the Buy Books for the Holidays blog has been added to the blogroll, along with an icon or badge in the right sidebar. The bottom line, though, is simple and straightforward: BUY BOOKS!


No man has a right to bring up his children without surrounding them with books, if he has the means to buy them. It is a wrong to his family. Children learn to read by being in the presence of books. The love of knowledge comes with reading and grows upon it.

Henry Ward Beecher, “The Duty of Owning Books

Book Review: Tomorrow! by Philip Wylie

It was an era more than half our population knows only through history. It was an era in which the United States went from being the only nation possessing nuclear weapons to facing the reality that the “Godless Commies” also had them. It was an era in which the Cold War blossomed, together with fear that it could well turn into a hot — and radioactive — one.

tomorrowPhilip Wylie’s 1954 novel Tomorrow! takes us inside that time, not only into the fears that existed but the debates over defense strategy and the need for and efficacy of the Civil Defense program. The book, re-released this month by Bison Books as part of its “Beyond Armageddon” series, can’t help but show it’s age, especially with references to “colored people” or using a worse epithet for the name of one area. Yet what is anachronistic today makes the era more real.

Wylie tells his story by way of two large cities on the Great Plains divided by a river and a state line. One, Green Prairie, is the exemplar of preparedness, with an active Civil Defense program. River City is the antithesis, abandoning any organized Civil Defense program. As such, Wylie can play out a debate over the value of Civil Defense in the face of nuclear weapons. Tomorrow! leaves no doubt which side Wylie is on. Still, that message does not mean his characters are simply unadorned storytelling devices. In fact, the potential future he envisions (“X-Day”) does not arrive until well more than halfway through the book. (Wylie’s 1963 novel, Triumph, dealt exclusively with a group of survivors of a nuclear World War III.)

Wylie builds the story largely on the interplay of three families. Except for the youngest daughter, the entire Conner family is actively involved in Green Prairie’s Civil Defense program and eldest son, Chuck, is a lieutenant in military intelligence. Social status is the primary concern of their next door neighbors, the Baileys. Mrs. Bailey dreams of marrying her daughter Lenore, Chuck’s longtime girlfriend, to Kit Sloan, the scion of the richest family in the two cities. While Lenore is active in Civil Defense, Mrs. Sloan is infuriated by the inconveniences caused by Green Prairie’s Civil Defense drills and embarks on a campaign critical of the program. Not only is the Civil Defense debate played out within these broad outlines but so are other aspects of real life, be it human weakness or loyalty to others or oneself.

Although Wylie is an advocate of a Civil Defense program, he also recognizes there is no precedent for and no way to predict human response to a nuclear attack. He would, in fact, raise that very issue in a review of three disaster studies in the December 1956 issue of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. In fact, Tomorrow! doesn’t fit firmly into a particular political ideology. It also takes on the dangers of McCarthyism and how casting things as either American or un-American is not only counter to the nation’s founding principles but weakens national security.

Some of the issues Tomorrow! raises persist. For example, the book indicates that by taking proper measures a nuclear war survivable. That thought still raises hackles for essentially saying nuclear war is “winnable.” Meanwhile, the Civil Defense debate has a few echoes in today’s Department of Homeland Security and an era in which nation-states do not alone pose cognizable threats.

That doesn’t make Tomorrow! prescient or predictive. In fact, one could debate whether it succeeded as a cautionary tale in 1950s America. Yet that is irrelevant to the fact the the book immerses today’s reader in an era in a way no nonfiction work could.


Our peril today, our ever-growing and and ever-more-horrible peril in the visible future, is the cost of saying we were free and acting otherwise.

Philip Wylie, Tomorrow!