Blogroll

Weekend Edition: 3-28

Bulletin Board

  • It’s my annual “hockey weekend.” The NCAA Division I men’s hockey tournament began yesterday. I watched three games and live cut-ins to a fourth yesterday (and went to a Stampede game last night). There’s six more games on TV today (making me thankful for DVRs) and two tomorrow. Not that I’m obsessed or anything.

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

  • You’re Not As Busy As You Say You Are (“The answer to feeling oppressively busy … is to stop telling yourself that you’re oppressively busy, because the truth is that we are all much less busy than we think we are.”)
  • The Case for Working Less (“…mythologizing about work fails to confront – indeed it actively conceals – the acute hardships of much work performed in modern society. For many, work is about doing ‘what you hate'”.)
  • Noah Isn’t Accurate Because It Can’t Be (“Most movies implying they were based on true events…have true events to base a script on. Noah does not for a number of reasons.”)

Blog Headline of the Week

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage

  • How medieval parents dealt with their teenagers
  • In a recent study in Italy, people hearing the sound of a hammer striking marble each time it tapped their hands felt like their limbs were made of stone

What happens on the ice is notably free from religious exhibitionism: players don’t kneel in prayer at center ice after a game or cross themselves before a breakaway. The game is the spirituality.

Chris Koentges, “The Oracle of Ice Hockey

Illogicality #1

Maybe age is making me increasingly curmudgeonly but I seem to see and hear more things taken at face value that leave me absolutely dumbfounded. The one I read today was so ironic and illogical that it prompts a new series called Illogicality. It will appear when items strike me as asinine enough to be worth dismantling. Appropriately, the inaugural edition is about as incongruous as you can get.

Uproar from various camps surrounds Darren Aronofsky’s new film, Noah, opening in the U.S. this Friday. Glenn Beck was criticizing the movie before seeing it so the studio gave him an advanced screening over the weekend. Beck continued the bashing unabated on his radio show Monday. Now he calls it “pro-animal and anti-human, and I mean strongly anti-human.” Well, let’s look at the source to figure out if he’s right.

According to the account in the New International Version of the Bible, “So God said to Noah, ‘I am going to put an end to all people.'” Genesis 6:13 (emphasis added). But he also instructed Noah “to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you.” Genesis 6:19 (emphasis added). Sounds about as pro-animal and anti-human to me as you can get.

You’d think Beck might know the story of Noah comes off that way because of the original author.


To bankrupt a fool, give him information.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, The Bed of Procrustes

What kind of library user are you?

Libraries and the role they play in people’s lives and their communities is an area the Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life project has been studying. Earlier this month, it released a report on what it calls “a typology of library engagement in American.” The report is based on Americans 16 years old and older and their attitudes, perceptions, and priorities relating to public libraries, in addition to their library use.

In creating this “typology,” though, the study doesn’t just focus on library users. It also included those who are “non-engaged,” which actually made up about 14 percent of the total. The study indicated Americans seem to fall into nine groups within four broad levels of library engagement: high (30%), medium (39%), (low 17%) and no personal library use (14%):

  • Library Lovers make up 10 percent of the total. As you would expect, this group uses libraries and library websites more than any other. Its members are disproportionately younger than the general population, tend to have higher levels of education and somewhat higher household incomes than many other groups but a notable share are in economically challenging circumstances (23% recently lost their jobs or saw a significant loss of income and 25% are currently looking for a job). Politically, they are more likely to be liberal and Democratic than the general population. Nearly two-third (62%) are women, 40% are parents, 17% are students, 66% read a book daily and 57% a regular bookstore visitors. They are heavy internet users and, not surprisingly, 98 percent have library cards and 87% visited the library in the prior 12 months, most of them weekly.
  • Information Omnivores make up 20 % of the population and their focus is on seeking and using information. This group is the highest ranking in socio-economic terms, with one of the highest employment rates and 35% living in households earning $75,000 or more. Like Library Lovers, this group is more likely to be Democratic and liberal compared with the general U.S. population. Fifty-seven percent are women and 40% are parents. They are the most intense users of technology: among internet users, 90% go online every day and 81% use social media. Almost half (46%) have a tablet computer and 68% own a smartphone. They read an average of 17 books in the previous 12 months and are more likely to buy books than borrow them. Ninety-two percent have library cards and 81 percent have visited the library in the prior 12 months.
  • Solid Center is the largest group at 30% of the population. More likely to live in small towns and cities, this group also seems to reflect the general U.S. population. Fifty-eight percent have library cards but only 43% visited a library in the prior 12 months. A third report their use of the library has dropped in the prior five years. This group is 57% male and only 28% have minor children living at home. More (34%) go to sporting events regularly than regularly go to bookstores (28%), although 37 percent have read at least one book in the last year. Only 5% used a library website in the prior year and only 26% have ever used one.
  • Print Traditionalists are 9% of the population. Thirty-five percent make less than $30,000 a year and only 11 percent have a public library within five miles. Despite that 48% say they visited the library in the last 12 months and this group read an average of 13 books in those 12 months. As might be expected by the library distance, 61 percent are from rural areas. Fifty-seven percent are women, the education of about half ended with high school diploma and their political views lean conservative.
  • Not For Me is 4% of the population and is made up of those who have used public libraries at some point in their lives, although few have done so recently. The group is 56% men and is 63% live in small towns or rural areas. Only 18% have graduated from college, less than half (41%) are married (41%) while only 39% are employed full-time and 23% are retired. Nearly a third (31%) did not read any books in the last year. Still, 40% have library cards although just 31% visited the library in the past year. Sadly, 64% say library closings would have no impact on them or their family.
  • Young and Restless constitutes 7% of the population. As the name suggests, 43% are under age 30. Surprisingly, only 15% say they even know where the local library, perhaps because a third have lived in their communities less than a year. Still, 32% have a library card and visited a library in the past year. Males make up 53% of the group and 37% live in households earning less than $30,000. Their age is reflected in technology use, with 82% accessed the internet with a mobile device and, of the internet users, 86% use social networking sites. Thirty-eight percent read a book in the prior year and group members read an average of 11 books in that time.
  • Rooted and Roadblocked is 7% of the population and has that name in part because 37% have lived in their community for 20 years or more. The roadblock aspect arises from 35% being retired, 27% living with a disability, and 34% experiencing experienced a major illness (either themselves or a loved one) within the past year. The median age is 58 and only a third visited the library in the prior 12 months. Only 36% have a library card and 28% did not read a book in the past 12 months. Despite that, more than half (54%) say library closing would affect them and their families in some way.
  • Distant Admirers are 10% of the population, matching Library Lovers for the third largest group. While they don’t personally use libraries, 40% have someone in their household who does. Again, the largest portion, 56%, is men, some 62% have a high school education or less and 42% live in households earning less than $30,000 a year. Interestingly, 37% report having a library card and 30% have read a book in the last year. When it comes to library closings, 60% say it would have some impact on them and their family and 85% say that of their community.
  • Off the Grid consists of 4% of the population. This group is off the grid in several ways. For example, fully 60 percent don’t regularly participate in community activities and only 44% read or watch the news. With a median age of 52, this group is 57% men, 83% live in small towns and rural areas, 34 percent never completed high school and 44% of the households have an income less than $30,000. There are a few quirks in the numbers, though. While these individuals are said never to have used a public library in their life, 19% have a library card. While half read no books in the prior 12 months, 25% read a book daily. Still, only 17% percent of the households have anyone in them who uses the public library and, not surprisingly, two-third say a library closing would have no impact on them or their family and only 39% believe a library improves a community’s quality of life.

There’s plenty of other interesting information in the study, including geographic region and race. Given my usage of and love for libraries, I find many of the statistics saddening. Still, I suppose the breadth of use (or lack thereof) reveals the diversity of the Americans and their lives.


Libraries are what is best about us as a society: open, exciting, rich, informative, free, inclusive, engaging

Susan Orlean

Weekend Edition: 3-21

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

  • If You Don’t Like Reading, You’re Doing It Wrong(“I am afraid too many people are stuck in the same place I was 9 years ago. They do not hold reading with disdain or harsh feelings. They simply do not know how to love reading. They are stuck with the notion that reading is tolerable and enjoyable if the subject is just right.”)
  • The Scourge of Coffee (“Coffee is a social scam in that we are compelled to believe that it energizes our interactions with one another, when it actually saps our drive — caffeine is scientific proof of the law of diminishing returns — while diverting our attention away from substantive discourse.”)

Saddest Societal Commentary of the Week

Security Breach of the Week

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


You will become way less concerned with what other people think of you when you realize how seldom they do.

David Foster Wallace, Infinite Jest

Weekend Edition: 3-15

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

  • How to save the US (“The solution is obvious. The US needs to model itself on its most sanctified institution: the military.”)
  • Reading to Have Read (“…the idea of Spritzing is the apotheosis of speed reading: reading in which completion is the only goal.”)
  • Let Me Count the Days (“Far too few slots remain in my life for anywhere near the number of books I want to read. Now what am I supposed to do when I go into a bookstore?”)

Blog Headline of the Week

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


One of the symptoms of approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that one’s work is terribly important, and that to take a holiday would bring all kinds of disaster,

Bertrand Russell, The Conquest of Happiness