Blogroll

Book Review: Eastern Europe! by Tomek Jankowski

History, even American history, doesn’t seem to be one of our strong suits. One recent assessment showed that 20 percent of fourth graders, 17 percent of eighth graders and only 12 percent of high school seniors demonstrated proficiency in U.S. history. And that’s history that actually matters to us. As anything outside that is likely viewed as irrelevant, our grasp of European history must be appalling. Even then, our focus has been on Western Europe and, at best, Eastern Europe is little more than an afterthought, if that.

Yet the importance of Eastern European history is seen in Tomek Jankowski’s Eastern Europe!: Everything You Need to Know About the History (and More) of a Region that Shaped Our World and Still Does. As he points out near the end of the book, after having documented the basis for his statements:

Eastern Europe is a concept invented … by the West, and it has always carried the connotation of a backward, underdeveloped, superstitious, and remote region isolated from the modern ideas and lifestyles of Western Europe. To be Eastern European implies that one is poor, undereducated, and provincial, and prone to occasional irrational fits of horrendous violence inspired by ethnic or religious fanaticism.

eastern europeYet Jankowski makes a strong case that a great deal of what makes up Western Europe today, from people to technologies to languages, probably came through Eastern Europe first. That is mostly a matter of geography. Jankowski views Eastern Europe as not only always surrounded by competing civilizations — Western Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa — but serving as a land connection between and among them. It was also a front line between Christianity and Islam, meaning it was a battleground on which “countless crusades and jihads were waged.” (In fact, there are an estimated 35 million Muslims in Eastern Europe today.)

After an “Introductory FAQ,” the book consists of two sections. The first looks at the development of languages in the region, its geography and the spread of religions. The second, and by far the longest, traces the history of the region from roughly 500 CE through the fall of Communism and its effects. It also contains a lengthy reference section full of statistics about Eastern Europe, as well as 42 pages of endnotes and a 19-page bibliography. In addition to its dozens of maps and photographs, Eastern Europe! the book includes numerous sidebars titled “Useless Trivia.” Although Jankowski suggests these contain “interesting but utterly useless historical, cultural or other completely senseless facts,” he does himself a disservice. They often provide glimpses of events and people and their resonance into today.

In tracing the history of Eastern Europe, the beginning of each chapter contains not only a timeline of events in Eastern Europe but also a separate timeline for Western Europe. This allows the reader to compare the various developments in each and the interplay between them. In fact, Western Europe’s impact on Eastern Europe is also unmistakable. For example, the unification of regions and peoples into nations such as Italy and Germany gave rise to similar hopes in Eastern Europe. And although we think of World War II in terms of the U.S. and Western European countries, “every Eastern European country lost the war, regardless of which side they chose or what their leaders did. This war haunts Eastern Europe as no other historical event does.”

In broad strokes, the history of Eastern Europe is the story of the rise and fall of and wars among various clans, kingdoms and the occasional empire. It often to consist largely of seemingly never-ending warfare among various entities that continually affect the balance of power and boundaries. Granted, the same observation might also be made about Western Europe. Jankowski tends to try to trace this in terms of particular kingdoms, ethnicity or nations. His chapter subtitles frequently serve as pithy summaries of what follows. For example, “Albania as Accident,” “Austria-Hungary as a Bug on the Windshield,” or “Montenegro is Pushed Off the Cliff.” Yet this separate lines also cause some problems. Because a particular event or war often affects several countries, it may be discussed in several subsections and readers may not grasp the entire picture.

Despite covering such a large amount of information and territory, Eastern Europe! remains highly readable and user friendly. It is not merely a recitation of dates and events but a plain language look at the whos and whys of its history. In fact, the book would be an excellent introductory guide for anyone planning to visit an area of Eastern Europe. It allows the reader to trace the country’s history and get a sense of its influences. That is important because, as Jankowski points out (and explains), the past remains alive in Eastern Europe. “For the average American, the American Revolution of 1775-83 was thousands of years ago,” he writes, “but for the average Eastern European, the 1389 battle of Kosovo Polje or the 1410 battle of Grunwald haven’t quite ended yet.” The book reinforces how often even modern conflicts among various ethnic groups, whether in Slovenia, Croatia or Bosnia, can only be understood by knowing the history of the region. Jankowski shows us this as he traces the changes in and development of the country from clans to a feudal system to “nations” to Soviet domination and after.

It is hard to imagine that a conversational, one volume work could not only introduce readers to Eastern European history but do a lot towards helping the reader understand it. In that respect, Eastern Europe! is both a success and an impressive achievement.


History is all about perspective. It isn’t usually that the facts change, it’s how they’re interpreted that changes.

Tomek Jankowski, Eastern Europe!

Whose Big Cock is that?

This post isn’t as NSFW as the headline might suggest. In fact, it deals with that titillating subject known as trademark law.

Seems that back in 2007, Chris Peterson, the owner of Dakota Hunting Trips of White River, obtained a trademark registration from the South Dakota Secretary of State for “Big Cock Country.” He says he’s used the phrase since 2001 on a variety of apparel sold mostly at truck stops in South Dakota. Peterson obtained a federal trademark registration for “Big Cock Country” in March this year. (Without getting into detail, it is much easier to prosecute trademark infringement claims with a federally registered trademark.)

In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Sioux Falls last Friday, Peterson claims that back in 2009 M & J Distributing of Watertown began selling clothing bearing the phrase “Big Cock Country.” He alleges the apparel was sold in a number of truck stops, including those Peterson used for retailers, and that, although inferior in quality, it has damaged his business. Peterson also alleges that despite repeated requests, M & J refuses to stop using his trademark.

The lawsuit makes a variety of trademark infringement and related claims. Absent settlement, the federal court ultimately will decide who owns “Big Cock Country.” Peterson is asking not only that M & J be enjoined from using “Big Cock Country,” but, as allowed by federal trademark law, he be awarded triple the damages caused by each type of infringing product or statutory damages of $2 million for each.

And even though I know it’s a term of art in trademark law, I still had to chuckle at the allegation in the complaint about “the fame and strength” of Peterson’s Big Cock mark.


All sides in a trial want to hide at least some of the truth.

Alan Dershowitz, U.S. News & World Report, Aug. 9, 1982

Weekend Edition: 10-26

Judge Evidently Missed a Day at the National Judicial College

  • A Texas judge was forced to resign after texting instructions, such as what questions to ask, to a prosecutor in a trial in her court

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


Never half-ass two things. Whole-ass one thing.

Ron Swanson (Nick Offerman), Parks and Recreation, “Sweet Sixteen”

Weekend Edition: 10-20

A day delay due to ongoing but intermittent internet issues. But I did learn that having your internet and phone lines down don’t qualify for weekend service if your cable TV still works.

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


It’s okay to be an asshole, as long as you’re good at it.

Noah Lugeons, The Scathing Atheist

Book Review: If Kennedy Lived by Jeff Greenfield

Some estimate books about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy number in the thousands. And with the 50th anniversary of the assassination coming next month, there’s been a growing stream of them this year about the assassination and Kennedy’s presidency and its legacy. Amidst the avalanche, political commentator Jeff Greenfield contemplates where we would be if Kennedy had not been killed. He does so through the alternative history trope in If Kennedy Lived: The First and Second Terms of President John F. Kennedy: An Alternate History.

kennedyThis isn’t Greenfield’s first venture into this genre. Last year, he released a Kindle single on Al Gore beating George Bush in the 2000 presidential election and Two years ago he took a broader scope in Then Everything Changed: Stunning Alternate Histories of American Politics: JFK, RFK, Carter, Ford, Reagan.

As Greenfield points out in both the preface and afterword to If Kennedy Lived, he believes alternative history needs to be founded on plausibility. Thus, everything prior to November 22, 1963, that plays a role in the book actually happened and Greenfield’s conjectures are predicated on historical documents of the times and thoughts of the actual people. Greenfield seeks to explore only what realistically might have happened, not with inventions like the time traveler who tries to prevent Kennedy’s assassination in Stephen King’s bestselling 11/22/63. Yet while a degree of plausibility is essential to believable alternative history, If Kennedy Lived also reveals the limitations of strict adherence to this approach.

Greenfield explores a number of key issues that might have been affected by Kennedy’s death, such as whether he would have kept U.S. forces in Vietnam or the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He even considers the possibility and ramifications of Kennedy’s philandering becoming public. Yet even the latter has a wonkish feel. The book tends to examine what might have happened more through policy debates than in terms of social ramifications. This doesn’t mean Greenfield totally ignores social impact. For example, he contemplates how different decisions about Vietnam might have affected the nature and focus of the protest movements of the 1960s. It’s just that there seems to be more discussion about policy and political implications of that change.

Greenfield both displays and uses a bit of irony when it comes to actual history. He points out that although Kennedy was pushing for tax cuts in 1963, the Republicans strenuously opposed the idea (although Congress approved cuts in 1964). The irony extends to noted individuals. For example, when the treasurer of a company founded by Jerry Rubin embezzles the money, Greenfield has Rubin saying, “I never should have trusted an accountant under thirty.” And in this timeline Richard Nixon does not tell David Frost in 1977 that “when the President does it, that means that it is not illegal.” Instead, this Nixon complains about the Kennedy Administration’s use of the IRS, saying, “Just because a president does it does not mean it’s legal.”

Certainly, given what those individuals actually said, it is plausible they might have said what Greenfield suggests. And perhaps it is because of this insistence on plausibility that the book concludes on the eve of the 1968 election, the end of the second term Kennedy wins in it. Thus, Greenfield does not extrapolate from the alternative scenarios he posits to look look at even longer term consequences.

Although unquestionably well researched and written, If Kennedy Lived has a bit too much of an “inside politics” feel.


John and Robert Kennedy lived by one philosophy: when it came to their political fortunes, the ends justified the means … any means.

Jeff Greenfield, If Kennedy Lived