Blogroll

Recommending a “worst” book?

Several years ago I blogged about how I thought some of Amazon’s music recommendations for me were a bit wacky. Now its got me wondering about the general emails it sends out recommending books in various subjects.

Yesterday I received an Amazon email suggesting some history books I “might be interested in.” Listed twice — the book first and the audio CD third among the four recommendations — was The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You’ve Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson. For those who pay attention, I noted a couple weekends ago that last month David Barton’s book was voted the Least Credible History Book in Print by the History News Network.

One commenter at HNN said, “Barton misrepresents and distorts a host of Jefferson’s ideas and actions, particularly his views and practices regarding religion, slavery and church-state relations. As Jefferson did with the Gospels, Barton chooses what he likes about Jefferson and leaves out the rest to create a result more in line with his ideology.” As might be expected, opinions on Amazon are split. One reviewer calls the book “one of the best-researched books on Jefferson you will ever see.” Another, though, says, “Barton structures his book around ‘lies’ rather than chapters.”

You know what, Amazon? I think I’m going to pass. But I bet TJ would love the debate over the book.


If [a] book be false in its facts, disprove them; if false in its reasoning, refute it. But, for God’s sake, let us freely hear both sides, if we choose.

Thomas Jefferson, April 19, 1814

Bibliolust the Last

I first started my Bibliolust posts in September 2008. That means this one would be the 48th — and I think four years is enough. It isn’t that I don’t lust after as many books. To the contrary, my use of ebook readers and increasing consumption of ebooks means it is often easier to lust. But there’s the flip side of the coin. It’s also easier to satisfy the lust more rapidly.

Over the last six months or so it’s seemed that I find and read most new books between the time I’ve posted one Bibliolust installment and before it’s time to post the next monthly installment. I don’t want to move this to more frequent installments so figure it’s a good time to call it an end. But I will go out with a big list. This month’s installment will include books that wouldn’t normally be in a Bibliolust post for a couple months — and it looks like October is going to be a great month. As for the statistics, I’ll save the final ones for a year-end post.

Here’s what’s on the horizon:

Bruce, Peter A. Carlin (October 2012)– Although I sometimes wonder what impact the subject has on the content of an “authorized” biography, there’s no way I’m missing one authorized by the Boss himself — especially since he’ll be playing in the area shortly after the book comes out. (I admit, though, to still being on the fence about a Springsteen biography that was released in early June.)

Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt, Chris Hedges and Joe Sacco — When I first heard these two were releasing a book that, in their words, looks at parts of America “that have been offered up for exploitation in the name of profit, progress, and technological advancement,” I was somewhat intrigued. I went beyond that when I learned the first chapter deals with Pine Ridge so I am still waiting for the library’s copy to arrive to complete my reserve request.

The Fall of the Stone City, Ismail Kadare (February 2013) — As you can see, the book isn’t slated for release in the U.S. until next year. Fortunately, the British publisher offered me a review copy so I will be reading and reporting on it before then. For some reason, Albania intrigues me (the story is set there during World War II) and I’ve thought for a while Kadare may well win the Nobel for Literature.

It’s Fine By Me, Per Petterson (October 2012) — I’ve been a big Petterson fan ever since I read Out Stealing Horses. While none have grabbed me quite as much, Petterson is a novelist whose books will always make my Bibliolust list.

Sweet Tooth, Ian McEwan (November 2012) — McEwan is another one of those author’s, like Petterson, who seems to have a spot reserved on my lust list whenever a new book comes out. McEwan has disappointed me perhaps a bit more than Petterson but when you’ve written a book that’s on my Desert Island Books list (Saturday), I figure you’ve earned the spot.

The Testament of Jessie Lamb, Jane Rogers — I’ve had my eye on this SF novel since it won the Arthur C Clarke Award in May. An opportunity to review it came up so you’ll hear more about it.

Waging Heavy Peace, Neil Young (October 2012) — Now how could a baby boomer music fan ever say no to a Neil Young autobiography? That’s especially so if, like me, you waded through the nearly 800-page biography of him published some eight years ago.

Who I Am: A Memoir, Pete Townshend (October 2012) — October must be musician biography/memoir month. While I’m not as big a fan of the Who as Springsteen and Young, this is another irresistible attraction.

Report Card:

January-July 2012

Total Bibliolust books: 29

Number read: 25 (86.2%)

Started but did not finish: 3 (10.3%)

Cumulative (September 2008-July 2012)

Total Bibliolust books: 232

Number read: 191 (82.3%)

Started but did not finish: 17 (7.3%)

…all disinterested lovers of books will always look to it … for refuge, a sort of cloistral refuge, from a certain vulgarity in the actual world

Walter Pater, Appreciations, with an Essay on Style

Weekend Edition: 7-28

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

  • We Are Alive (“…you cannot underestimate the fine power of self-loathing in all of this.”)

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


But it’s a sad man my friend who’s livin’ in his own skin
And can’t stand the company

Bruce Springsteen, “Better Days,” Lucky Town

Book Review: Comic Books and the Cold War, 1946-1962, edited by Chris and Rafiel York

As David Hadju documents in his excellent examination of comic books in the 1940s and 1950s, The Ten-Cent Plague, adults saw the genre as contributing to juvenile delinquency and even subverting American values. This uproar, which included U.S. Senate hearings, led to the creation of the Comic Codes Authority in 1954. Yet even before the code, the Cold War often produced comic books that tended to inculcate American values. The methods and influences and explored in Comic Books and the Cold War, 1946-1962: Essays on Graphic Treatment of Communism, the Code and Social Concerns.

Edited by brothers Chris and Rafiel York, the essays look how comic books of that era weren’t just entertainment and amusement, as those of us who grew up then may have believed. Although occasionally repetitive, the book shows how comic books often reflected government policy and attitudes toward community mores.

The essays focus on what comics communicated to and about society during the “Containment” era. Containment was the brainchild of George F. Kennan and became the basis of our foreign policy. At its core, it was predicated on the belief that the U.S. could combat the Soviet Union’s efforts to spread Communism with “a policy of firm containment, designed to confront the Russians with unalterable counter-force at every point where they show signs of encroaching upon he interests of a peaceful and stable world.” But Kennan didn’t believe this effort was limited to foreign policy. “Every courageous and incisive measure to solve internal problems of our own society, to improve self-confidence, discipline, morale and community spirit of our own people, is a diplomatic victory over Moscow,” he said in a telegram from the U.S. Embassy in Moscow.

The domestics aspects of containment are the focus of the essays in Comic Books and the Cold War. While some of the comics told stories of direct confrontation between the forces of good (America) and evil (foreign or other worldly enemies), many were much more subtle or, as we are told repeatedly, metaphoric. For example, Frederick A. Wright’s essay on the Flash comics, “I Can Pass Right Through Solid Matter!” (which actually tells messages are being conveyed “metaphorically” in three consecutive paragraphs), suggests that the bank robbers the Flash might be viewed as “the capitalist fear of communist system’s redistributing the wealth.” Or that a villain’s efforts to freeze the Flash or prevent his movement represents the Cold War restricted the movements of America in foreign policy.

The domestic message is best summarized in Rafiel York’s essay on the Archie comics, “Rebellion in Riverdale.” The comics help the federal government:

promote[] an American lifestyle that was characterized by morality, the family, economic progress and personal fulfillment. The America that would best combat the communist threat was one where men went to work and earned enough money that their wives were able to stay home with the kids in a suburban house stocked with the latest appliances. while focusing on making themselves beautiful. It was an American where people went to church on Sundays, and practiced the morality they learned there the rest of the week. It was an America where people prided themselves on being “normal. It was an America where all teenagers acted like Archie and the Riverdale gang.”

And how did Archie and crew act for the most part? They don’t represent the average teenager but are “typical only of the kind of teenager that most adults want to have around.”

Comic Books and the Cold War makes clear that even if the comics of that era weren’t overtly intended to inculcate “American values,” they certainly reflected much of the thinking of the era. Thus, we see battles for dominance and containment in space, threats of espionage, the risk to girls of sexually errant behavior, both the promise and threat of science and even flat out “godless Commies.” Still, there was a bit of subversion. In her essay “The Amazon Mystique,” Ruth McClelland-Nugent suggests Wonder Woman was an early vehicle of nascent feminism while Diana Green suggests EC Comics occasionally dealt with GLBTQ themses. Even characters in Archie occasionally break traditional gender roles or profit from arguably immoral behavior.

Focusing as it does on a specific era and relatively narrow themes, Comic Books and the Cold War does not intend to be and is far short of The Ten-Cent Plague. It often has more of an academic tone than the casual reader may want and some of the essays, frankly, don’t really tell us a lot. Still, it provides interesting perspective on the role of comic books in shaping public opinion and trying to mold young readers during the height of the Cold War.


Primers and comics underscored the lurking threat communists posed to Americans and introduced their young audience to the anxieties and paranoia of the era.

Peter Lee, “Decrypting Espionage Comic Books in 1960s America,”
Comic Books and the Cold War, 1946-1962

Weekend Edition: 7-21

Interesting Reading in the Interweb Tubes

  • The Bookless Library (“Clinging to an outdated vision of libraries is in fact the best recipe for making them look hopelessly obsolescent to the men and women who control their budgets[.]”)

Worthwhile Reading about Aurora

  • One More Massacre (“The truth is made worse by the reality that no one—really no one—anywhere on the political spectrum has the courage to speak out about the madness of unleashed guns and what they do to American life.”)
  • The body count (“I will hear conspiracy theories from those who fear the government, I will hear about the need to raise a militia, and I will hear nothing about how 9,484 corpses in a year has helped anything. That is a high price to pay. What depresses me is that half of my fellow countrymen are prepared to pay it.”)
  • “Guns Don’t Kill” (“We just have to face the facts: Americans, unlike Englishmen and Canadians, are murderous by nature. The ready availability of assault weapons has nothing to do with it.”)

Blog Headline of the Week

Bookish Linkage

Nonbookish Linkage


Realize that life, not stuff, is what matters. Objects are just objects — if you lose them, if they get stolen or destroyed … it’s not a big deal. They’re just objects — not your life.

Leo Babauta, “Love Life, Not Stuff